Jump to content

Talk:Passion (Peter Gabriel album): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Split ''Passion: Sources''?: I went ahead and did it - see Pasion - Sources
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{Album}}, {{WikiProject World music}}.
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{Album}}
{{WikiProject Albums}}
{{WikiProject Regional and national music|importance=mid}}
}}


== Split ''Passion: Sources''? ==
== Split ''Passion: Sources''? ==
Line 5: Line 8:
Any reason why ''Passion: Sources'' shouldn't have its own article? There's already a track listing. I've just uploaded a photo so it wouldn't take much effort to create an infobox. Just thought I'd ask first in case these two albums had been previously merged into the present article. -- [[User:Gyrofrog|Gyrofrog ]] [[User_talk:Gyrofrog|(talk)]] 22:01, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
Any reason why ''Passion: Sources'' shouldn't have its own article? There's already a track listing. I've just uploaded a photo so it wouldn't take much effort to create an infobox. Just thought I'd ask first in case these two albums had been previously merged into the present article. -- [[User:Gyrofrog|Gyrofrog ]] [[User_talk:Gyrofrog|(talk)]] 22:01, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
:Well, I decided to go ahead and split ''[[Passion - Sources]]'' to its own article. -- [[User:Gyrofrog|Gyrofrog ]] [[User_talk:Gyrofrog|(talk)]] 21:49, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
:Well, I decided to go ahead and split ''[[Passion - Sources]]'' to its own article. -- [[User:Gyrofrog|Gyrofrog ]] [[User_talk:Gyrofrog|(talk)]] 21:49, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

There was some strange language criticizing the 'corporate-controlled lands' of the United States and the UK. While the nature of whether these countries are so-controlled is a perhaps interesting debate, that judgment and its surety should not be in this article.[[User:Wideeyedraven|Wideeyedraven]] <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Wideeyedraven|Wideeyedraven]] ([[User talk:Wideeyedraven|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wideeyedraven|contribs]]) 00:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

= Reviews =
Maybe include some review sources to cleanup the area mentioning his other work as "muddled" in comparison <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.47.121.97|69.47.121.97]] ([[User talk:69.47.121.97|talk]]) 23:19, 12 November 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Latest revision as of 01:57, 14 January 2024

Split Passion: Sources?

[edit]

Any reason why Passion: Sources shouldn't have its own article? There's already a track listing. I've just uploaded a photo so it wouldn't take much effort to create an infobox. Just thought I'd ask first in case these two albums had been previously merged into the present article. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 22:01, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I decided to go ahead and split Passion - Sources to its own article. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 21:49, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There was some strange language criticizing the 'corporate-controlled lands' of the United States and the UK. While the nature of whether these countries are so-controlled is a perhaps interesting debate, that judgment and its surety should not be in this article.Wideeyedraven —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wideeyedraven (talkcontribs) 00:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

[edit]

Maybe include some review sources to cleanup the area mentioning his other work as "muddled" in comparison —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.121.97 (talk) 23:19, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]