Jump to content

Talk:Pepper (band): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Pstarbuck (talk | contribs)
126 edits
mNo edit summary
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
Bots
7,106,680 edits
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Reggae}}.
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Pop music}}
{{WikiProject Reggae|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Punk music|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Rock music|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Alternative music|importance=}}
}}

==Untitled==
Jesus, the section about the DVD is foaming at the mouth with delight at THE BEST BAND EVER LOLOLOL!!ZAZA!! releasing a paltry morsel of new material. It's been excised. [[User:Fuzzycasserole|aubrey]] 03:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Jesus, the section about the DVD is foaming at the mouth with delight at THE BEST BAND EVER LOLOLOL!!ZAZA!! releasing a paltry morsel of new material. It's been excised. [[User:Fuzzycasserole|aubrey]] 03:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


Line 6: Line 15:


I agree, the end of this article is clearly biased and the content really doesn't serve to increase anybody's knowledge of this band, it seems more like a press release to generate hype rather than an encyclopedia article. Perhaps it should be edited to keep the facts, but do away with the parts which create a bias.[[User:Pstarbuck|Paul]] 18:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 04:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
I agree, the end of this article is clearly biased and the content really doesn't serve to increase anybody's knowledge of this band, it seems more like a press release to generate hype rather than an encyclopedia article. Perhaps it should be edited to keep the facts, but do away with the parts which create a bias.[[User:Pstarbuck|Paul]] 18:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 04:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Very much agreed. Opinions are like weeds here, creeping through the facts to the point where they are as common as each other. This article needs a MAJOR makeover. Besides the point, Pepper is a great band and deserve better than a horrifically biased page.

Is there anyway they can state the obvious RHCP similarity.

I cleaned up the article the best I could, removed opinionated material.

== POV tag ==
I reviewed the article and the above comments, I see strong evidence of restoration of NPOV. The tag (undated) is from May 2006, and much of the POV material has been removed. Removing POV tag. Keep up the good work at building a NPOV informative article regarding this band. [[User:DocGratis|DocGratis]] 14:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on [[Pepper (band)]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/817267477|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100725043909/http://pepperlive.com/bio/ to http://pepperlive.com/bio
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110621102026/http://pepperlive.com/bio/ to http://pepperlive.com/bio/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091006021813/http://www.pepperlive.com/bio.htm to http://www.pepperlive.com/bio.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081002095938/http://www.livedaily.com/news/10649.html to http://www.livedaily.com/news/10649.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080512031816/http://livedaily.com/news/14166.html to http://www.livedaily.com/news/14166.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090216121047/http://livedaily.com/news/15667.html to http://www.livedaily.com/news/15667.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 07:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

== Orphaned references in [[:Pepper (band)]] ==

I check pages listed in [[:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting]] to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for [[User:AnomieBOT/docs/OrphanReferenceFixer|orphaned references]] in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of [[:Pepper (band)]]'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for ''this'' article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

<b>Reference named "Charts":</b><ul>
<li>From [[Natural Vibrations]]: "[http://www.allmusic.com/artist/natural-vibrations-mn0000862771/awards Billboard Albums]", [[Allmusic]]. Retrieved June 18, 2014</li>
<li>From [[Slightly Stoopid]]: {{cite web|url=http://www.billboard.com/biz |title=Charts |publisher=Billboard.biz }} Search under Charts for Slightly Stoopid</li>
</ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<span style="color:#880">⚡</span>]] 05:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:47, 14 January 2024

Untitled

[edit]

Jesus, the section about the DVD is foaming at the mouth with delight at THE BEST BAND EVER LOLOLOL!!ZAZA!! releasing a paltry morsel of new material. It's been excised. aubrey 03:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is so utterly biased I honestly can't even tell if it's meant to be sarcastic. andy 21:59, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't seem to be overly biased until the final section with the caps and adjectives about how swell Pepper is.

I agree, the end of this article is clearly biased and the content really doesn't serve to increase anybody's knowledge of this band, it seems more like a press release to generate hype rather than an encyclopedia article. Perhaps it should be edited to keep the facts, but do away with the parts which create a bias.Paul 18:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 04:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Very much agreed. Opinions are like weeds here, creeping through the facts to the point where they are as common as each other. This article needs a MAJOR makeover. Besides the point, Pepper is a great band and deserve better than a horrifically biased page.

Is there anyway they can state the obvious RHCP similarity.

I cleaned up the article the best I could, removed opinionated material.

POV tag

[edit]

I reviewed the article and the above comments, I see strong evidence of restoration of NPOV. The tag (undated) is from May 2006, and much of the POV material has been removed. Removing POV tag. Keep up the good work at building a NPOV informative article regarding this band. DocGratis 14:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Pepper (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Pepper (band)

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Pepper (band)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Charts":

  • From Natural Vibrations: "Billboard Albums", Allmusic. Retrieved June 18, 2014
  • From Slightly Stoopid: "Charts". Billboard.biz. Search under Charts for Slightly Stoopid

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pepper_(band)&oldid=1195540958"