Talk:Nasopharynx: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Redirect" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Anatomy}}. |
|||
(12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Redirect|1= |
|||
[[Link title]]'''''Bold text''[[[Link title] |
|||
{{WikiProject Anatomy |importance=NA |field=Gross}} |
|||
== [[Image:Headline text]]<nowiki><nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki><nowiki><br />Insert non-formatted text here<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><ref>{| class="wikitable" |
|||
}} |
|||
|- |
|||
{{merged-to|Pharynx|February 2014}} |
|||
Insert footnote text here |
|||
|}<blockquote> |
|||
== Should this article be merged into [[Human pharynx]]? == |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
I believe it should, as it remains a stub after more than 4 years since its creation. Seems a bit excessive to me to have three stubs ([[nasopharynx]], [[oropharynx]], and [[hypopharynx]]) in addition to one Start-class article ([[human pharynx]]), when we could have one C-class article describing the [[human pharynx]], with a section for each of the above. [[User:DiverDave|DiverDave]] ([[User talk:DiverDave|talk]]) 11:06, 28 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Block quote |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
<gallery> |
|||
<small>Image:Example.jpg|Caption1 |
|||
Image:Example.jpg|Caption2</small><!-- <!-- Comment --><br /><br /><br /><sup><s>Superscript text</s><s><s>Strike-through text</s><s> |
|||
---- |
|||
Strike-through text--~~~~</s></s></sup> --> |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
</blockquote></ref></nowiki></nowiki> == |
|||
]]''' |
Latest revision as of 18:52, 14 January 2024
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The contents of the Nasopharynx page were merged into Pharynx on February 2014 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Should this article be merged into Human pharynx?
[edit]I believe it should, as it remains a stub after more than 4 years since its creation. Seems a bit excessive to me to have three stubs (nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx) in addition to one Start-class article (human pharynx), when we could have one C-class article describing the human pharynx, with a section for each of the above. DiverDave (talk) 11:06, 28 July 2010 (UTC)