Jump to content

Talk:Nasopharynx: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rated article in relation to Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy (Mid)
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Redirect" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Anatomy}}.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Medicine|class=stub|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Redirect|1=
{{WikiProject Anatomy |importance=NA |field=Gross}}
{{WPAN|class=start|importance=mid}}
}}
{{merged-to|Pharynx|February 2014}}


== Should this article be merged into [[Human pharynx]]? ==
== Should this article be merged into [[Human pharynx]]? ==

Latest revision as of 18:52, 14 January 2024

Should this article be merged into Human pharynx?

[edit]

I believe it should, as it remains a stub after more than 4 years since its creation. Seems a bit excessive to me to have three stubs (nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx) in addition to one Start-class article (human pharynx), when we could have one C-class article describing the human pharynx, with a section for each of the above. DiverDave (talk) 11:06, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]