Talk:2009 Nobel Prize: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Assessment for WP:SWEDEN - start/low |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
|||
{{WPSweden|importance=Start|class=Low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Sweden}} |
||
}} |
|||
<!-- Formerly assessed as redirect-class --> |
|||
== Annual articles a good idea? == |
|||
I'm not entirely sure that it is relevant to have annual articles, in addition to the articles on the respective prizes and the various overview articles. Any thoughts? [[User:Tomas e|Tomas e]] ([[User talk:Tomas e|talk]]) 15:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I concur. I initially tagged this page for a CSD A11 as it pretty much recreates the content available on [[List of Nobel Laureates]] but I'd like other opinions.--[[User:Falcon8765|Falcon8765]] ([[User talk:Falcon8765|talk]]) 23:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::Well, the only thing that I see that this type of article (or rather, 100+ articles in a series of this type) could really add, would be specific information on that year's award ceremonies. However, I see no such information currently. I suggest to give the discussion a week or so, and if no substantial support emerges in that time, redirect it to the main [[Nobel Prize]] article rather than deleting it via an "admin route". [[User:Tomas e|Tomas e]] ([[User talk:Tomas e|talk]]) 09:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::There is also a discussion of this article here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nobel_Prize/GA1] |
|||
There is the reason to why it was created. --[[User:Esuzu|Esuzu]] 18:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
I redirected it; there's no real point to having annual articles when [[List of Nobel laureates]] exists. — [[User:Sephiroth BCR|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script; color:navy;">'''sephiroth bcr'''</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Verdana;">'''([[User talk:Sephiroth BCR|<span style="color:blue;">converse</span>]])'''</sup> 07:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:58, 17 January 2024
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Annual articles a good idea?
[edit]I'm not entirely sure that it is relevant to have annual articles, in addition to the articles on the respective prizes and the various overview articles. Any thoughts? Tomas e (talk) 15:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- I concur. I initially tagged this page for a CSD A11 as it pretty much recreates the content available on List of Nobel Laureates but I'd like other opinions.--Falcon8765 (talk) 23:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well, the only thing that I see that this type of article (or rather, 100+ articles in a series of this type) could really add, would be specific information on that year's award ceremonies. However, I see no such information currently. I suggest to give the discussion a week or so, and if no substantial support emerges in that time, redirect it to the main Nobel Prize article rather than deleting it via an "admin route". Tomas e (talk) 09:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- There is also a discussion of this article here: [1]
- Well, the only thing that I see that this type of article (or rather, 100+ articles in a series of this type) could really add, would be specific information on that year's award ceremonies. However, I see no such information currently. I suggest to give the discussion a week or so, and if no substantial support emerges in that time, redirect it to the main Nobel Prize article rather than deleting it via an "admin route". Tomas e (talk) 09:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
There is the reason to why it was created. --Esuzu 18:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
I redirected it; there's no real point to having annual articles when List of Nobel laureates exists. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 07:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)