Talk:Egyptian Air Force: Difference between revisions
Winstonwolfe (talk | contribs) |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. |
||
(159 intermediate revisions by 62 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= |
|||
==Early history== |
|||
{{WikiProject Egypt|importance=High}} |
|||
The early history section of this article was copied without acknowledgement from the identical pages at [http://www.angelfire.com/nb/eaf/history.html] and |
|||
{{WikiProject Military history|class=Start |
|||
[http://www.geocities.com/egyptianairforce/history.html]. These pages are in very poor English - the writer has no grasp of tenses - and is rather jingoistic and not particularly accurate. Working from memory I have altered the early history sections but this is a temporary fix - someone really needs to do the job properly. Also something on the War of Attrition would be good. |
|||
|National=yes |
|||
|Aviation=yes |
|||
|WWII=yes |
|||
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |
|||
|B-Class-1=no |
|||
<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |
|||
|B-Class-2= yes |
|||
<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |
|||
|B-Class-3= yes |
|||
<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |
|||
|B-Class-4= yes |
|||
<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |
|||
|B-Class-5= yes}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|||
|counter = 1 |
|||
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
|algo = old(30d) |
|||
|archive = Talk:Egyptian Air Force/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
}} |
|||
{{copied|from=February 2015 Egyptian airstrikes in Libya|to=Egyptian Air Force|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=&diff=prev&oldid=708791959}} |
|||
{{Archives|age=30|bot=lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|||
== F4 Phantom in Egyptian Service == |
|||
and I shall see to its development. |
|||
I recently added F4Es into the current aircraft list using a recent list I found online, however someone removed them and said they had been retired. Could someone else confirm this as I couldn't find any information about their removal from service online. I only speak and read English, unfortunately. |
|||
== Conflicting reports on Future Aircraft Section == |
|||
Maybe the article need REW because: |
|||
1. "Egypt found itself attacking Israel with the British withdrawal from Palestine and the founding of Israel in 1947." |
|||
There seems to be conflicting sources in the Future aircraft section, specifically on the MiG-35 and Su-35 deals. For the part that says 50 MiG-35 were ordered, it lacks the source (which is on the MiG-35 page), however there are contentions that this was in fact just the EAF's MiG-29M/M2 order as they are very similar, if not the same aircraft. I haven't been able to properly review these on my own so if someone with more direct knowledge on the EAF could look into that section that would be very helpful. We should also be careful about the people coming in here with the sole purpose of making the EAF seem much stronger than it actually is without using sources. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ironarcher13|Ironarcher13]] ([[User talk:Ironarcher13#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ironarcher13|contribs]]) 13:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Maybe the British forces were withdrawing from Israel in 1947, but the withdrawal finished only in May 1948- and only then Israel was founded. |
|||
2. "The Egyptian Air Force contributed to this conflict with C-47 Dakotas and Spitfires, claiming two Israeli aircraft destroyed, although '''unfortunately''' many more Egyptian aircraft were lost" |
|||
== TAI Turkish Aerospace produced 46 F16's == |
|||
:POV |
|||
I see a lot of editors or trolls reverting this information i want to know first why? secondly the goal of this revert? |
|||
3. "'''After Nasser decided to nationalize the Suez Canal''', Egypt '''got involved''' in a war with Israel, France, and the United Kingdom." |
|||
Here is the official TAI deal link <ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=tai link|url=https://www.tusas.com/en/product/egypt-f-16-program|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=|website=}}</ref> |
|||
:First of all, Israel declered war on Egypt because Egypt closed straits of Tiran- and it should but said here. Secondly, "got involved" is bad explanation for the situation - the meaning of closing straits of Tiran and naionalizing the Suez canal was a war - the leadership in Egypt, and Nasser knew it. |
|||
4. "These strikes were launched at 2 p.m. October 6 and were made without any air opposition from the Israeli air force" |
|||
More links |
|||
:It's not true. Please read [[2-28 Air Battle]]. |
|||
https://www.arabianaerospace.aero/phantom-wing-finally-re-equipped-with-f-16s.html |
|||
==[[Wikify]] and [[NPOV]] tags== |
|||
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/tu-f-16.htm |
|||
I have added Wikify and POV tags, because: |
|||
elektrischeinstallaties.blogspot.com |
|||
- the syntax and grammar of this article should be imporved. |
|||
https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2005-01-13-Lockheed-Martin-Sells-Its-Share-of-Turkish-Joint-Venture-to-Turkish-Aircraft-Industries-Inc-TUSAS |
|||
- there is a pro-Egyptian bias, (although I respectfully disagree with the critique of the term "got involved", as the vast majority of non-Zionist opinion is that Israel started the war by attacking Egypt - c.f. 1973, when Egypt started the war by attacking Israel, and I consider the article cited - "2-28 Air Battle" to have a clearly pro-Israeli bias, and also breach NPOV). [[User:Winstonwolfe|Winstonwolfe]] 07:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
PLEASE STOP REVERTING FOR NO REASON[[User:Cengizsogutlu|Cengizsogutlu]] ([[User talk:Cengizsogutlu|talk]]) 01:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
: Hello, just wanted to give my reasoning for reverting your second addition to the TAI F-16 production. I think the current 1 sentence gives the reader a good idea of what occurred, and then the ability to continue researching it themselves, but the second addition is overly detailed for this type of section, especially as it is written like its a new occurrence, when in fact those F-16s were assembled in the 90's. If you want to give more information on how some of Egypt's F-16 fleet were actually constructed by TAI, I recommend adding a segment to the first part of the Aircraft section, as this would make a lot more sense and not clog up the inventory section. Hopefully this conflict can be ended soon. [[User:Ironarcher13|Ironarcher13]] ([[User talk:Ironarcher13|talk]]) 13:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
::Just heads up I will be moving the extensive TAI F-16 production noting up into the main article. We want to avoid cramming detailed information into table entrie(s), the reader should be able to click a Wikilink to see detailed article corresponding concise table entry. per: [[WP:WHENTABLE]] - I will note the licensed production in the F-16 section though- cheers [[User:FOX 52|FOX 52]] ([[User talk:FOX 52|talk]]) 15:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:::Well as long as Cengizsogutlu is good with the move we should consider this issue over with. Thanks for the help Fox, happy editing. [[User:Ironarcher13|Ironarcher13]] ([[User talk:Ironarcher13|talk]]) 21:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
{{reflist-talk}} |
|||
== Egyptian Su-35 quantity == |
|||
In the list of aircraft table, it said that Egypt has 5 Su-35 in service. However, the receiving of Su-35 by Egypt would be a secret between them and Russia. That's why media sources were very silent after the first 5 fighters arrived in Egypt. But then, came this website from 'Bmpd Livejournal' website, which is a Russian one. The article had a paragraph that said the aircraft the Russians had exported to different countries. This paragraph said that in 2020, the Russian defense industry exported 22 Su-35 to the Egyptian air force. So far, Bmpd livejournal didn't publish any updates on the Su-35 contract. By we know that Egypt received 22 Su-35 fighters. I edited the amount with the sources, but the edit got canceled after a couple hours. If you are having trouble finding the paragraph, just click the 3 dots and click 'Find in page'. Then write "22 Su", and right away it will tell you that 22 Su-35 fighters had been delivered to Egypt. I will edit again, and add source. Here is the source: https://bmpd.livejournal.com/4240466.html [[User:AbdoHesham123|AbdoHesham123]] ([[User talk:AbdoHesham123|talk]]) 14:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:13, 17 January 2024
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from February 2015 Egyptian airstrikes in Libya was copied or moved into Egyptian Air Force with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
F4 Phantom in Egyptian Service
[edit]I recently added F4Es into the current aircraft list using a recent list I found online, however someone removed them and said they had been retired. Could someone else confirm this as I couldn't find any information about their removal from service online. I only speak and read English, unfortunately.
Conflicting reports on Future Aircraft Section
[edit]There seems to be conflicting sources in the Future aircraft section, specifically on the MiG-35 and Su-35 deals. For the part that says 50 MiG-35 were ordered, it lacks the source (which is on the MiG-35 page), however there are contentions that this was in fact just the EAF's MiG-29M/M2 order as they are very similar, if not the same aircraft. I haven't been able to properly review these on my own so if someone with more direct knowledge on the EAF could look into that section that would be very helpful. We should also be careful about the people coming in here with the sole purpose of making the EAF seem much stronger than it actually is without using sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironarcher13 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
TAI Turkish Aerospace produced 46 F16's
[edit]I see a lot of editors or trolls reverting this information i want to know first why? secondly the goal of this revert? Here is the official TAI deal link [1]
More links https://www.arabianaerospace.aero/phantom-wing-finally-re-equipped-with-f-16s.html https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/tu-f-16.htm elektrischeinstallaties.blogspot.com https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2005-01-13-Lockheed-Martin-Sells-Its-Share-of-Turkish-Joint-Venture-to-Turkish-Aircraft-Industries-Inc-TUSAS
PLEASE STOP REVERTING FOR NO REASONCengizsogutlu (talk) 01:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, just wanted to give my reasoning for reverting your second addition to the TAI F-16 production. I think the current 1 sentence gives the reader a good idea of what occurred, and then the ability to continue researching it themselves, but the second addition is overly detailed for this type of section, especially as it is written like its a new occurrence, when in fact those F-16s were assembled in the 90's. If you want to give more information on how some of Egypt's F-16 fleet were actually constructed by TAI, I recommend adding a segment to the first part of the Aircraft section, as this would make a lot more sense and not clog up the inventory section. Hopefully this conflict can be ended soon. Ironarcher13 (talk) 13:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Just heads up I will be moving the extensive TAI F-16 production noting up into the main article. We want to avoid cramming detailed information into table entrie(s), the reader should be able to click a Wikilink to see detailed article corresponding concise table entry. per: WP:WHENTABLE - I will note the licensed production in the F-16 section though- cheers FOX 52 (talk) 15:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Well as long as Cengizsogutlu is good with the move we should consider this issue over with. Thanks for the help Fox, happy editing. Ironarcher13 (talk) 21:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ "tai link".
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
Egyptian Su-35 quantity
[edit]In the list of aircraft table, it said that Egypt has 5 Su-35 in service. However, the receiving of Su-35 by Egypt would be a secret between them and Russia. That's why media sources were very silent after the first 5 fighters arrived in Egypt. But then, came this website from 'Bmpd Livejournal' website, which is a Russian one. The article had a paragraph that said the aircraft the Russians had exported to different countries. This paragraph said that in 2020, the Russian defense industry exported 22 Su-35 to the Egyptian air force. So far, Bmpd livejournal didn't publish any updates on the Su-35 contract. By we know that Egypt received 22 Su-35 fighters. I edited the amount with the sources, but the edit got canceled after a couple hours. If you are having trouble finding the paragraph, just click the 3 dots and click 'Find in page'. Then write "22 Su", and right away it will tell you that 22 Su-35 fighters had been delivered to Egypt. I will edit again, and add source. Here is the source: https://bmpd.livejournal.com/4240466.html AbdoHesham123 (talk) 14:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- B-Class Egypt articles
- High-importance Egypt articles
- WikiProject Egypt articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class national militaries articles
- National militaries task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles