Talk:2013 PDC World Darts Championship: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|||
{{WikiProject Darts|importance=High}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Bracket== |
==Bracket== |
||
To be honest the current 64 player bracket looks awful with the averages breaking the lines. Splitting the bracket might not be the worst idea, i find 8 sections to much though. We could also shorten names by only using the last names. -[[User:Koppapa|Koppapa]] ([[User talk:Koppapa|talk]]) 17:04, 2 December 2012 (UTC) |
To be honest the current 64 player bracket looks awful with the averages breaking the lines. Splitting the bracket might not be the worst idea, i find 8 sections to much though. We could also shorten names by only using the last names. -[[User:Koppapa|Koppapa]] ([[User talk:Koppapa|talk]]) 17:04, 2 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
:How about 4 quarters like this? Prelim would fit in nicely, not?-[[User:Koppapa|Koppapa]] ([[User talk:Koppapa|talk]]) |
:How about 4 quarters like this? Prelim would fit in nicely, not?-[[User:Koppapa|Koppapa]] ([[User talk:Koppapa|talk]]) |
||
::I like the look of that. The 64 player bracket is already starting to look untidy. [[User:Boddefan2009|Boddefan2009]] ([[User talk:Boddefan2009|talk]]) 15:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::Disagree think it looks better how it is now. [[User:Spc 21|Spc 21]] ([[User talk:Spc 21|talk]]) 16:57, 22 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
::64 man bracket is very awkward on the eyes. I would support the 4 quarters solution.--[[User:The Skeleton|The Skeleton]] ([[User talk:The Skeleton|talk]]) 18:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::I now switched to last names for round 2 and onwards. That opened the bracket a lot. -[[User:Koppapa|Koppapa]] ([[User talk:Koppapa|talk]]) 11:21, 2 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
===Quarter 2=== |
===Quarter 2=== |
||
{{32TeamBracket-Byes |
{{32TeamBracket-Byes |
Latest revision as of 02:24, 18 January 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Bracket
[edit]To be honest the current 64 player bracket looks awful with the averages breaking the lines. Splitting the bracket might not be the worst idea, i find 8 sections to much though. We could also shorten names by only using the last names. -Koppapa (talk) 17:04, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- How about 4 quarters like this? Prelim would fit in nicely, not?-Koppapa (talk)
- I like the look of that. The 64 player bracket is already starting to look untidy. Boddefan2009 (talk) 15:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- Disagree think it looks better how it is now. Spc 21 (talk) 16:57, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- 64 man bracket is very awkward on the eyes. I would support the 4 quarters solution.--The Skeleton (talk) 18:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- I now switched to last names for round 2 and onwards. That opened the bracket a lot. -Koppapa (talk) 11:21, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- I like the look of that. The 64 player bracket is already starting to look untidy. Boddefan2009 (talk) 15:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Quarter 2
[edit]Prelim | 1st Round | 2nd round | 3rd round | quarter-final | ||||||||||||||||||||
Whitlock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harrington | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Muramatsu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colin Osborne | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ilagan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Lewis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chisnall | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tischowitch | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
smith | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gurney | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marjanović | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scotland Gary Anderson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Komula | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Haavisto | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Caven | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rodríguez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bowles | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Barney | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
M Smith | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dolan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
JOnes |