Jump to content

Talk:2013 PDC World Darts Championship: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Darts|importance=High}}
}}

==Bracket==
==Bracket==
To be honest the current 64 player bracket looks awful with the averages breaking the lines. Splitting the bracket might not be the worst idea, i find 8 sections to much though. We could also shorten names by only using the last names. -[[User:Koppapa|Koppapa]] ([[User talk:Koppapa|talk]]) 17:04, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
To be honest the current 64 player bracket looks awful with the averages breaking the lines. Splitting the bracket might not be the worst idea, i find 8 sections to much though. We could also shorten names by only using the last names. -[[User:Koppapa|Koppapa]] ([[User talk:Koppapa|talk]]) 17:04, 2 December 2012 (UTC)


:How about 4 quarters like this? Prelim would fit in nicely, not?-[[User:Koppapa|Koppapa]] ([[User talk:Koppapa|talk]])
:How about 4 quarters like this? Prelim would fit in nicely, not?-[[User:Koppapa|Koppapa]] ([[User talk:Koppapa|talk]])
::I like the look of that. The 64 player bracket is already starting to look untidy. [[User:Boddefan2009|Boddefan2009]] ([[User talk:Boddefan2009|talk]]) 15:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
:::Disagree think it looks better how it is now. [[User:Spc 21|Spc 21]] ([[User talk:Spc 21|talk]]) 16:57, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
::64 man bracket is very awkward on the eyes. I would support the 4 quarters solution.--[[User:The Skeleton|The Skeleton]] ([[User talk:The Skeleton|talk]]) 18:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
:::I now switched to last names for round 2 and onwards. That opened the bracket a lot. -[[User:Koppapa|Koppapa]] ([[User talk:Koppapa|talk]]) 11:21, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
===Quarter 2===
===Quarter 2===
{{32TeamBracket-Byes
{{32TeamBracket-Byes

Latest revision as of 02:24, 18 January 2024

Bracket

[edit]

To be honest the current 64 player bracket looks awful with the averages breaking the lines. Splitting the bracket might not be the worst idea, i find 8 sections to much though. We could also shorten names by only using the last names. -Koppapa (talk) 17:04, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How about 4 quarters like this? Prelim would fit in nicely, not?-Koppapa (talk)
I like the look of that. The 64 player bracket is already starting to look untidy. Boddefan2009 (talk) 15:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree think it looks better how it is now. Spc 21 (talk) 16:57, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
64 man bracket is very awkward on the eyes. I would support the 4 quarters solution.--The Skeleton (talk) 18:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I now switched to last names for round 2 and onwards. That opened the bracket a lot. -Koppapa (talk) 11:21, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quarter 2

[edit]
Prelim 1st Round 2nd round 3rd round quarter-final
               
Whitlock
 
Harrington
Muramatsu
 
 
Colin Osborne
 
Ilagan
J. Lewis
 
 
Chisnall
Tischowitch
 
 
smith
 
Gurney
Marjanović
 
 
Scotland Gary Anderson
  0
Komula
Haavisto 3
 
 
Caven
 
Rodríguez
Bowles
 
 
Barney
M Smith
 
 
Dolan
JOnes