Talk:2015 North American Soccer League season: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 05:22, 18 January 2024

Football: American & Canadian / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Combined Table

The combined table seems to indicate that the top 4 qualify for the post season. Strictly speaking only 1st and 2nd are guaranteed to, as the spring and fall season winners could finish lower (with a poor other half-season). Any ideas on how the table could be improved? Red Jay (talk) 18:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spring/Fall attendance tables

Since the page now has a full attendance table, I feel that the split attendance tables are a bit redundant and should be removed since they don't offer any additional information. Unlike the standings, there isn't any real difference between the Spring and Fall in terms of attendance, instead it just gives rather skewed data. Would anyone oppose this edit? QQ2NFLD (talk) 03:39, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support They are redundant. Cepiolot (talk) 13:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
-{{Football}}
+{{WikiProject Football|importance=Low|Canada=yes|USA=yes|season=yes}}
+}}
 == Combined Table ==
-The combined table seems to indicate that the top 4 qualify for the post season.  Strictly speaking only 1st and 2nd are guaranteed to, as the spring and fall season winners could finish lower (with a poor other half-season).  If the season was over today Edmonton would qualify, rather than Minnesota.  Any ideas if the table could be improved?   [[User:Red Jay|Red Jay]] ([[User talk:Red Jay|talk]]) 18:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
+The combined table seems to indicate that the top 4 qualify for the post season.  Strictly speaking only 1st and 2nd are guaranteed to, as the spring and fall season winners could finish lower (with a poor other half-season).  Any ideas on how the table could be improved?   [[User:Red Jay|Red Jay]] ([[User talk:Red Jay|talk]]) 18:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
+== Spring/Fall attendance tables ==
+Since the page now has a full attendance table, I feel that the split attendance tables are a bit redundant and should be removed since they don't offer any additional information. Unlike the standings, there isn't any real difference between the Spring and Fall in terms of attendance, instead it just gives rather skewed data. Would anyone oppose this edit? [[User:QQ2NFLD|QQ2NFLD]] ([[User talk:QQ2NFLD|talk]]) 03:39, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
+: '''Support''' They are redundant. [[User:Cepiolot|Cepiolot]] ([[User talk:Cepiolot|talk]]) 13:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)