Jump to content

Talk:2019 European Parliament election in Bulgaria: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject European Union|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject European Union|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Bulgaria|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Bulgaria|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums |class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums }}
}}
}}
{{center|'''Number of page views in the past 30 days'''
{{center|'''Number of page views in the past 30 days'''
Line 22: Line 22:
[[User:C-Kobold|C-Kobold]] ([[User talk:C-Kobold|talk]]) 01:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
[[User:C-Kobold|C-Kobold]] ([[User talk:C-Kobold|talk]]) 01:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)


:The numbers are definitely off. If you look at the CSV files they provided, they are still full of uncorrected errors in the protocol data, even after they issued a list of errata. The number of votes for parties and candidates does not match the total numbers of votes written by the section commissions, because many commissions made silly mistakes when they had to add together the machine and paper votes. They should have double (or triple) checked, but they rushed the results through. All in all, they botched up the final results, and we can only hope the deviations are not too large. --[[Special:Contributions/212.39.89.214|212.39.89.214]] ([[User talk:212.39.89.214|talk]]) 21:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
:The numbers are definitely off. If you look at the CSV files they provided, they are still full of uncorrected errors in the protocol data, even after they issued a list of errata. The calculated number of votes for parties and candidates does not match the total numbers of votes when you add up the manually written totals by the section commissions, because many commissions made silly mistakes when they had to add together the machine and paper votes. They should have double (or triple) checked, but they rushed the results through. All in all, they botched up the final results, and we can only hope the deviations are not too large and that there was no malicious intent. --[[Special:Contributions/212.39.89.214|212.39.89.214]] ([[User talk:212.39.89.214|talk]]) 21:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:55, 18 January 2024

Number of page views in the past 30 days

election fraud - numbers are WRONG

[edit]

The numbers do not add up and must be wrong:

+ 2.015.341 (valid votes, "Общият брой на действителните гласове (сумата от числата по т. 7 от протоколите на СИК)")

+ 80.238 (blank and invalid votes, "Брой на недействителни гласове (сумата от числата по т. 6 от протоколите на СИК)")

= 2.095.579 ; but the template and the website says

2.095.561 ("Брой на намерените в избирателната/ите кутия/и бюлетини (сумата от числата по т. 5, от протоколите на СИК)")

C-Kobold (talk) 01:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The numbers are definitely off. If you look at the CSV files they provided, they are still full of uncorrected errors in the protocol data, even after they issued a list of errata. The calculated number of votes for parties and candidates does not match the total numbers of votes when you add up the manually written totals by the section commissions, because many commissions made silly mistakes when they had to add together the machine and paper votes. They should have double (or triple) checked, but they rushed the results through. All in all, they botched up the final results, and we can only hope the deviations are not too large and that there was no malicious intent. --212.39.89.214 (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]