Talk:2021 Munster abuse case: Difference between revisions
m Xx78900 moved page Talk:2021 Munster Abuse Case to Talk:2021 Munster abuse case: Fixing erroneous capitalization of the title |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA|19:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)|subtopic=law|page=1|oldid=1080685318}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA| |
||
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
== Page name == |
|||
Hi all, |
|||
I created this page, but I'm wondering if I've actually named it the right thing. The case was first reported on in 2021, but actually took place between 2014 and 2016. I don't want to just name it "Munster abuse case", because I think it should be temporally grounded. After all, this was hardly the first, nor will it be the last, case of abuse heard in the province. Does anyone have any guidance? Thanks, [[User:Xx78900|Xx78900]] ([[User talk:Xx78900|talk]]) 17:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
{{Talk:2021 Munster abuse case/GA1}} |
|||
Hi there, thanks for having a look at this. You’re dead right I haven’t added the most up to date info, which is released. I’m away at the moment, but I will be able to input it tomorrow night or Monday at the very latest. Thanks again. [[User:Xx78900|Xx78900]] ([[User talk:Xx78900|talk]]) 22:10, 22 January 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:01, 18 January 2024
2021 Munster abuse case has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 2, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page name
[edit]Hi all,
I created this page, but I'm wondering if I've actually named it the right thing. The case was first reported on in 2021, but actually took place between 2014 and 2016. I don't want to just name it "Munster abuse case", because I think it should be temporally grounded. After all, this was hardly the first, nor will it be the last, case of abuse heard in the province. Does anyone have any guidance? Thanks, Xx78900 (talk) 17:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2021 Munster abuse case/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 21:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Reading now. Before I start, two quick questions, if I may:
- Is the article up-to-date? Any news about the sentencing, which should have taken place already?
- Are major changes to the article to be expected in the near future?
- Avoid single sentence paragraphs where possible via MOS:PARA.
Thanks, --Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi there, thanks for your patience. I'm just going to look over it now. The article is not up-to-date, but I'll update it this minute. Once I have it updated, given that the update is just about victim impact statements and the sentencing results, I would expect no more major changes to be made to this article for quite some time. I will adjust the paragraphs accordingly. Thank you. Xx78900 (talk) 13:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Okay I actually have to run, but I'll be back tonight, I want to have this article up-to-date before the day is out. Xx78900 (talk) 14:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Xx78900: Where are we standing on this? Will you ping me once you are done? At least the lead does not seem to be up-to date. Thanks, --Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:53, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry I forgot to update the lede when did the body. All of the info should now be up-to-date. @Jens Lallensack Xx78900 (talk) 11:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Xx78900: Where are we standing on this? Will you ping me once you are done? At least the lead does not seem to be up-to date. Thanks, --Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:53, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Okay I actually have to run, but I'll be back tonight, I want to have this article up-to-date before the day is out. Xx78900 (talk) 14:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, I'm just very occupied in RL. Please see my comments below.
- We usually avoid citations in the lead except for very controversial stuff, since everything should be mentioned in the body anyways. Done
- "notably low IQ" – I can't find "notably" in the source, it just says "low IQ"; what is the reasoning here? Done
- melatonin – link? Done
- Parts of the section "Living conditions" is repetitive since living conditions are partly covered in the "backgrounds" section. Maybe remove that information from the background section to improve structure? Done
- I recommend to avoid very short paragraphs (with one or two sentences) by combining them, see MOS:LINEBREAKS. Done
- Each of the accused had their own defense counsel. – I think it should be stated here how many were accused. And here I see another problem; until now, only the two parents and one uncle was mentioned. The uncles do not appear in the background section (while the parents do); it would help to mention them as well I think. Done
- What is Gardaí? Should be introduced and linked. Done
- The father of the five children, aged 56, was charged with 34 different counts, including rape, – I think it would make sense to remove the examples here, as they are listed anyways in the next sentence on the ones they were found guilty. It reads very repetitive. Done
- She described as being so thin upon arrival that – "him" missing? Done
- parents.Since – space missing? Done --Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:04, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Status query
[edit]Jens Lallensack, Xx78900, where does this nomination stand? The most recent edit by Xx78900 to the article was on 7 February, and the most recent edit to this page was over a month ago. Any chance of it being completed soon? Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:41, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- If the above outstanding comments are addressed, I may pass it; they are mostly minor points. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:46, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Many thanks to the IP for the fixes! I am promoting now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for having a look at this. You’re dead right I haven’t added the most up to date info, which is released. I’m away at the moment, but I will be able to input it tomorrow night or Monday at the very latest. Thanks again. Xx78900 (talk) 22:10, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- GA-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- GA-Class Ireland articles
- Low-importance Ireland articles
- GA-Class Ireland articles of Low-importance
- All WikiProject Ireland pages