Talk:2nd Marine Division (South Korea)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2nd Marine Division (South Korea). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101128160840/http://talkingproud.us/Military/ROKVIetnam/ROKVIetnamIntro.html to http://www.talkingproud.us/Military/ROKVIetnam/ROKVIetnamIntro.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2nd Marine Division (South Korea). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608043749/http://www.history.army.mil/books/Vietnam/allied/ch06.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/books/Vietnam/allied/ch06.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522132552/http://www.marines.mil/news/publications/Documents/US%20Marines%20In%20Vietnam%20Vietmanization%20and%20Redeployment%201970-1971%20PCN%2019000309600_2.pdf to http://www.marines.mil/news/publications/Documents/US%20Marines%20In%20Vietnam%20Vietmanization%20and%20Redeployment%201970-1971%20PCN%2019000309600_2.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608043749/http://www.history.army.mil/books/Vietnam/allied/ch06.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/books/Vietnam/allied/ch06.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608043749/http://www.history.army.mil/books/Vietnam/allied/ch06.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/books/Vietnam/allied/ch06.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608043749/http://www.history.army.mil/books/Vietnam/allied/ch06.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/books/Vietnam/allied/ch06.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:43, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

The document seems to have been deliberately negative.

Most of the stories about killing civilians and claiming it as an enemy are claims made by groups that intentionally degrade the Korean military. To make matters worse, the writer who wrote only the cruel aspects of the Korean army in the document did something similar in other joint military documents related to the Vietnam War. We need a closer investigation and a better change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.8.129.74 (talk) 09:32, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

No, we need to quote WP:RS as per the Wikipedia requirement. 182.239.145.107 (talk) 07:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Why are you responding to a 4.5 year old comment? Mztourist (talk) 09:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

The comment remains relevant to anybody reading it, as you and I just did. Thanks for the link to the other article; I did not know that it existed. 182.239.145.107 (talk) 20:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)