Jump to content

Talk:AGM-129 ACM: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WPMILHIST|class=C|B1=no|B2=yes|B3=yes|B4=yes|B5=yes
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|B1=no|B2=yes|B3=yes|B4=yes|B5=yes
|Aviation=yes|US=yes|Weaponry=yes
|Aviation=yes|US=yes|Weaponry=yes}}
|portal1-name=United States Air Force|portal1-link=Vehicle Spotlight/4}}
{{WikiProject Aviation|Aircraft-project=yes
{{WPAVIATION
|Aircraft-project=yes
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = n
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = n
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> =y
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> =y
Line 9: Line 8:
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = y
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = y
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = y
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = y
}}
|class=C
}}
}}


Line 23: Line 22:


:Updated the article with that link. PraetorianD 02:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:PraetorianD|PraetorianD]] ([[User talk:PraetorianD|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PraetorianD|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Updated the article with that link. PraetorianD 02:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:PraetorianD|PraetorianD]] ([[User talk:PraetorianD|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PraetorianD|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== The AGM-129 can also be carried on the B-2 Spirit Bomber ==
According to Military factory, the B-2 Spirit bomber can carry 16 AGM-129 ACMs, which would mean that they can be carried on platforms other than the B-52 Stratofortress, and that the part of the page that says that the AGM-129 is "exclusively" carried on the B-52 is incorrect. <ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail-page-2.asp?aircraft_id=6 |title = Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit Strategic Heavy Bomber / Stealth Bomber - United States}}</ref>
[[Special:Contributions/107.12.192.66|107.12.192.66]] ([[User talk:107.12.192.66|talk]]) 17:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Anonymous

{{reflist-talk}}

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[AGM-129 ACM]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=742012296 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060208091814/http://www.dtic.mil:80/matris/sbir/sbir041/srch/af276.pdf to http://www.dtic.mil/matris/sbir/sbir041/srch/af276.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 03:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:33, 19 January 2024

Is the AGM-129 really being retired?

[edit]

The "Operational History" section currently says "In March 2007... the USAF announced that it will retire its entire inventory of AGM-129 missiles." It cites a 2007-09-05 source. Later another 2007 source is cited. The USAF fact sheet page, http://www.af.mil/information/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=3548 , currently says "The ACM is anticipated to remain in service until 2030." This page is dated 5/24/2010. I am not an expert on the AGM-129 or the best sources of USAF inventory sources. (I am merely a person who likes planes and missiles... a lot.  :) Nevertheless, it seems like af.mil with a recent date is a good source for this sort of fact. Does anybody have any thoughts? Should we update this page?

Sorry, I forgot to sign... Statistical Mechanic (talk) 01:28, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Russian wikipedia has this link: http://www.tinker.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123299303

seems they were retied and destroyed more than a year ago. Why doesn't the English page contain this info?5.102.215.187 (talk) 14:07, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the article with that link. PraetorianD 02:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PraetorianD (talkcontribs)

The AGM-129 can also be carried on the B-2 Spirit Bomber

[edit]

According to Military factory, the B-2 Spirit bomber can carry 16 AGM-129 ACMs, which would mean that they can be carried on platforms other than the B-52 Stratofortress, and that the part of the page that says that the AGM-129 is "exclusively" carried on the B-52 is incorrect. [1] 107.12.192.66 (talk) 17:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Anonymous[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit Strategic Heavy Bomber / Stealth Bomber - United States".
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AGM-129 ACM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]