Jump to content

User talk:HerkusMonte: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Always precious: new section
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


{{clear}}
{{clear}}
==Thank you!==
== Precious anniversary ==
I just thought to check and saw that you have been systematically reverting those automated deletions of former placenames by Materialscientist that I challenged at their user talk and then asked about at WikiProject Poland (discussion continues) and WikiProject Germany. I don't know how you have even identified them, Materialscientist makes so many edits, but there is clear agreement that the name removals, at least, should be undone. Thank you very much for stepping up and doing that. [[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]] ([[User talk:Yngvadottir|talk]]) 12:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
:Seconded, thank you. The names of these towns as they were known to the world for centuries, and perhaps more importantly as they were known the people who lived their lives there and whose bones are buried in that earth, are undeniably historically and genealogically relevant and deserve to be included. Inclusion of these names should not be regarded as controversial in the slightest. Your efforts in this matter have my appreciation and support. [[User:Ascended Dreamer|Ascended Dreamer]] ([[User talk:Ascended Dreamer|talk]]) 23:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
{{User QAIbox
| title = Precious
| image = Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
| image_upright = 0.45
| bold = [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Precious#HerkusMonte|Four years!]]
}}
--[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
Six years now! --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>

<div class="ivmbox-text">
== [[Template:Did you know nominations/Nun, Brüder, sind wir frohgemut]] ==
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

HerkusMonte, there is a problem with the review you posted here: there is no icon indicating what the result of the review is.

The problem seems to be that you have not filled out the {{tl|DYK checklist}} template correctly. In particular, the instructions for the "status" field, which causes an icon to be displayed, are as follows: {{tq|Put "y" if no problems, "?" for minor problems, "maybe" if nomination needs work, "no" if completely ineligible, "again" to request another reviewer take a look}}. You haven't used any of these values, so no icon appears.

Please return to the review at your earliest convenience to fix the template and complete your review. Thank you very much. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 06:14, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, HerkusMonte. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.


If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=866998124 -->

==DYK nomination of Hans Bredow==
[[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Hans Bredow]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Hans Bredow|your nomination's entry]]''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:29, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

{{User QAIbox
| title = [[User:Gerda Arendt/Images 2019|April]]
| image = Waldsauerklee, Rauenthal.jpg
| image_upright = 0.7
| bold =
| normal = ... with thanks from [[WP:QAI|QAI]]
}}
Thank you for the article! It's also featured on [[Portal:Germany]]. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:15, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

== Königsberg ==

Hello HerhusMonte, your sweeping reversal - what do you mean by "POVish", please - has put back all the poor English copyedits and such unfortunate and colossal bloomers like describing Hebrew script as "Yiddish" for the city's name! Is it possible you could be more exacting and helpful in your editing?? --[[User:Po Mieczu|Po Mieczu]] ([[User talk:Po Mieczu|talk]]) 12:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

:{{ping|Po Mieczu}} Why did you move specific languages to the top? I don't see any reason to split the names like that. I'm unable to read Hebrew, I guess it's just the specific spelling of the Yiddish "Kenigsberg" in Hebrew letters.I don't think it's actually a different name.

:Calling the [[Albertina]] an "initially Polish and Lithunaian intellectual center“ is an [[WP:Exceptional claims|exceptional claim]] which needs a much better source than the source you provided (a [[wayback machine]] version of "Albertina on postcards and stamps"). The Albertina was a German language University from the start, your selective choice of notable students shows a significant national (POVish) bias.

:You replaced a section header [[Duchy of Prussia]] with [[Polish Prussia]]. Polish Prussia is a term used for [[Royal Prussia]], the western part of the Teutonic Order's state which became part of Poland in 1466. Königsberg was not part of Royal/Polish Prussia. Again a POVish edit.

:Some other changes were just minor sentence constructions, grammatically wrong (Stadtstheater) or unsourced. I'm pretty sure the Königsberg garrison wasn't "quartered" and [[Christian Ludwig von Kalckstein]] wasn't assassinated but sentenced to death by a Prussian court.

:If you think some of your changes should be adopted, please seek [[WP:Consensus]] at the relevant talk page. [[User:HerkusMonte|HerkusMonte]] ([[User talk:HerkusMonte#top|talk]]) 13:10, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

== Ethnicity of Spätaussiedler ==

Look, English wikipedia very clearly says that they could be of any ethnicity, not just ethnic Germans: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_return#Germany

Quote from the "Right of return" article, "Germany" section: "German law allows (1) persons descending from German nationals '''OF ANY ETHNICITY''' or (2) persons of ethnic German descent and living in countries of the former Warsaw Pact (as well as Yugoslavia) the right to "return" to Germany and ("re")claim German citizenship."

Also, Spätaussiedler do not have to be Reichsdeutsche but also Volksdeutsche (who were not German citizens before WW2, but lived for example in Volhynia).

[[User:Domen von Wielkopolska|Domen von Wielkopolska]] ([[User talk:Domen von Wielkopolska|talk]]) 16:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

: Here is Deutsche Welle article about Spätaussiedler which clearly mentions that many of them were ethnic Poles or with mixed Polish-German identity:
: https://www.dw.com/pl/emigracja-z-polski-do-niemiec-liczna-i-prawie-niewidoczna/a-16181647 [[User:Domen von Wielkopolska|Domen von Wielkopolska]] ([[User talk:Domen von Wielkopolska|talk]]) 16:58, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
: Actually the article mentions Czesław Gołębiewski and [[Lukas Podolski]] as examples of ethnic Polish Spätaussiedler (not family members, but Spätaussiedler - they could be ethnic Poles or other ethnic Slavs as well). I will remove those edits by sock. [[User:Domen von Wielkopolska|Domen von Wielkopolska]] ([[User talk:Domen von Wielkopolska#top|talk]]) 17:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

== Question about Spätaussiedler ==

Immigrants from pre-war Polish Silesia (East Upper Silesia) were also counted as Spätaussiedler or not?

Because there were around 2 million Einhemische Silesians there in 1950: https://i.imgur.com/HmJiihn.png

Source (Tabelle 7): https://ulis-buecherecke.ch/pdf_neben_dem_krieg/schlesien_und_die_schlesier.pdf

Wojewodschaft Kattowitz included small part of West Upper Silesia with over 300,000 Autochthons, but the remaining 2 million were Einhemische Silesians from East Upper Silesia, which had been part of Poland already before 1939. Many East Upper Silesians also emigrated to Germany for economical reasons.

If they were counted as Spätaussiedler, then you cannot equate Spätaussiedler with "autochthons of Regained Lands".

In such case I suggest we should remove the statement about the number of Spätaussiedler because it has nothing to do with the number of "autochthons of Regained Lands", as Spätaussiedler could be recruited also from other groups (Volksdeutsche in all regions of Poland, even Lublin etc., Silesians in East Upper Silesia which is not part of "Regained Lands", etc.).

I removed that statement from those two articles, but I added it to the article about Right of return: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_return#Germany

And I added "See also" templates linking to Right of return page to those two Ostgebiete-related articles.

[[User:Domen von Wielkopolska|Domen von Wielkopolska]] ([[User talk:Domen von Wielkopolska|talk]]) 10:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

==[[Template:Did you know nominations/Ontario (steamboat)]]==
Please see note on your DYK review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:59, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
: I fixed it. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2019|2019 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019#Election_timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=926750323 -->

==Charles Fryatt==
Hi, can you provide an English translation of the quote you added to the reference? I think it would benefit those readers who don't speak German. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 03:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

== Gdansk vote ==

Please respect Gdansk vote-it isn't used for modern locations in Poland or administrative districts.--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 12:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|MyMoloboaccount}}: "''For Gdansk and other locations that share a history between Germany and Poland, the first reference of one name in an article should also include a reference to other names''" These districts obviously share a history, the date of construction of the current houses is completely irrelevant. [[User:HerkusMonte|HerkusMonte]] ([[User talk:HerkusMonte#top|talk]]) 14:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
::Warsaw shares a lot of history with Germany Herkus-are you claiming all locations in Warsaw and its administrative districts should have Germanised names? For instance are you claiming [[]]Wola district should have Germanised name just because [[Wola Massacre]] happened there?--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 14:12, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
::::Please try to keep this discussion factual. [[User:HerkusMonte|HerkusMonte]] ([[User talk:HerkusMonte#top|talk]]) 14:17, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
:::::Sorry,are you saying Wola Massacre didn't happen? Please clarify. I believe you are seriously misrepresenting the vote-it isn't used for descriptions of modern locations but for historical part of the articles. Since all of Poland was once under German occupation in WW2 your interpretation would mean every Polish location should have a Germanised name-which is obviously wrong and absurd.--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 14:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

==Masurian People's Party==
Hello. Just a heads up: You introduced a contradictory claim in this article that an MVP candidate received around a third of the vote in a constituency, but the winning Conservative Party candidate received 73% of the vote. Cheers, [[User:Number 57|<span style="color: orange;">Number</span>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<span style="color: green;">5</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<span style="color: blue;">7</span>]] 18:52, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

==Notable Masurians==

Hi, [[Hieronim Malecki]] moved to Masuria in the 1500s but at that time a lot of Poles/Masovians were moving to Masuria, so I think he should be added back because he was one of the "founders" of this population, and he was Lutheran. I'll add him back. The ones without articles on English Wikipedia were taken from Polish Wikipedia.<br>[[User:Domen von Wielkopolska|Domen von Wielkopolska]] ([[User talk:Domen von Wielkopolska|talk]]) 12:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

==DYK nomination of Carlshof Institutions==
[[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Carlshof Institutions]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at '''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Carlshof Institutions|your nomination's entry]]''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 18:11, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

== Translation request ==

Hello HerkusMonte, Would you write / translate the article of [[Isabelle de Charrière]] (Q123386) for the NDS Wikipedia? That would be appreciated. [[User:Boss-well63|Boss-well63]] ([[User talk:Boss-well63|talk]]) 13:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=990308186 -->

== Precious anniversary ==
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

== Please see... ==

...[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Otto_von_Bismarck#Deletions this]. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 06:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

{{-}}
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1056563210 -->

== Precious anniversary ==
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 10:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of [[:Template:FDP chairs]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|30px|link=]][[:Template:FDP chairs]] has been [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|nominated for deletion]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 22#Template:FDP chairs|the entry on the Templates for discussion page]].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> [[User:Gonnym|Gonnym]] ([[User talk:Gonnym|talk]]) 12:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)


</div>
== [[Szczecin]] pre-war Polish community ==
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1187132125 -->
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Category:Mayors of Breslau]]==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]


A tag has been placed on [[:Category:Mayors of Breslau]] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a [[:Category:Disambiguation categories|disambiguation category]], a [[:Category:Wikipedia soft redirected categories|category redirect]], a [[:Category:Wikipedia featured topics categories|featured topics category]], under discussion at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|Categories for discussion]], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under [[WP:CSD#C1|section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion]].
HerkusMonte, please do not restore a stand alone statement that is blatantly bias into a high level city article. To call a minority, no matter how small a "social group" is blatantly demeaning and bias at best and racist at worst. The pre-war Polish community was around 1,500-2,000 people, and was similar in size to the city's Jewish community. Would Jan Musekamp also call the Jewish community a "social group", saying something like a Jewish social group was deported to concentration camps??? Jan Musekamp's statement according to today's standards is demeaning and racist, and unfortunately even after the fall of the Berlin wall, some German historians continued to make and got away with making racist statements towards Poles. --[[User:E-960|E-960]] ([[User talk:E-960|talk]]) 20:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
:[[User:E-960|E-960]] You might start with a little research about [[de:Jan Musekamp]]. who received the Polish ambassador's Prize for his outstanding dissertation about the history of Szczecin before making such statements. However, I rewrote that sentence without using that specific term. [[User:HerkusMonte|HerkusMonte]] ([[User talk:HerkusMonte#top|talk]]) 08:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
::I've responded on the article talk page. --[[User:E-960|E-960]] ([[User talk:E-960|talk]]) 13:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)


If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Category:Mayors of Breslau|visiting the page]] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 02:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
== After 1945... ==
[[File:Gerson Without land.jpg|thumb|Pomeranians driven out by the Germans in the 11th century, by Wojciech Gerson (1831–1901)]]


== Always precious ==
I would perhaps advise that you refrain form adding stand alone text about "before 1945" (it was Germany) or "after 1945" (expelled Germans) into every Polish town and village article. In many case, it appears that the new text exceeds what's already written in these small stub articles, thus clearly creating issues of undue weight and balance. Also, if you want to expand on the history of a particular place, then please start at the beginning, as most of those areas were part of the Piast Poland and were inhabited by the Slavs, before German colonization. 1945 is not the "start of history", for those places. --[[User:E-960|E-960]] ([[User talk:E-960|talk]]) 14:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
[[File:Yogo2783 Close crop.JPG|frameless|right|upright=0.5]]
Ten years ago, [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Precious#{{BASEPAGENAME}}|you]] were found precious. That's what you are, always. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 16:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:40, 21 January 2024

Thank you!

[edit]

I just thought to check and saw that you have been systematically reverting those automated deletions of former placenames by Materialscientist that I challenged at their user talk and then asked about at WikiProject Poland (discussion continues) and WikiProject Germany. I don't know how you have even identified them, Materialscientist makes so many edits, but there is clear agreement that the name removals, at least, should be undone. Thank you very much for stepping up and doing that. Yngvadottir (talk) 12:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded, thank you. The names of these towns as they were known to the world for centuries, and perhaps more importantly as they were known the people who lived their lives there and whose bones are buried in that earth, are undeniably historically and genealogically relevant and deserve to be included. Inclusion of these names should not be regarded as controversial in the slightest. Your efforts in this matter have my appreciation and support. Ascended Dreamer (talk) 23:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Mayors of Breslau indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 02:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Always precious

[edit]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]