Talk:Rydberg state: Difference between revisions
Reassessment from stub to start |
Tag: |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Physics|importance=low}} |
||
}} |
|||
{{merged-from|Rydberg correction|August,2020}} |
|||
==''fractional'' Rydberg numbers?== |
|||
A company called BlackLight Power (http://www.blacklightpower.com) claims to be able to get the electron in a hydrogen atom to jump to a quantum state representing a ''fractional'' Rydberg number. As the electron is then closer to the nucleus, energy would be released. This flies in the face of everything I thought I understood about quantum mechanics and atomic structure. Is there a chance the person who wrote this article could add something discussing the possibility (or not) of fractional Rydberg numbers? [[User:WilliamSommerwerck|WilliamSommerwerck]] ([[User talk:WilliamSommerwerck|talk]]) 12:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Proposed merge == |
|||
I propose merging the article [[Rydberg correction]] into this one, because it's a tiny stub lacking context. It would be easier to understand as part of this article. If nobody objects, I will come back in a month or so to do the merge. [[User:Reyk|<b style="color: Maroon;">Reyk</b>]] <sub>[[User talk:Reyk|<b style="color: Blue;">YO!</b>]]</sub> 08:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC) |
|||
*'''strong objection''' These are two completely different concepts. The Rydberg state is an inflated atom or molecule. The correction is a change to the energy of an electron due to non point charges. The Correction applies to all atomic states, including the ground state. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 10:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC) |
|||
**Then what would you prefer to do with this badly sourced, contextless stub? [[User:Reyk|<b style="color: Maroon;">Reyk</b>]] <sub>[[User talk:Reyk|<b style="color: Blue;">YO!</b>]]</sub> 02:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
::Closed, given that there is no support for the merge; there seems no doubt that article improvement is needed, hence the ''attention from an expert on the subject'' remains. [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 21:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:22, 24 January 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The contents of the Rydberg correction page were merged into Rydberg state on August,2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
fractional Rydberg numbers?
[edit]A company called BlackLight Power (http://www.blacklightpower.com) claims to be able to get the electron in a hydrogen atom to jump to a quantum state representing a fractional Rydberg number. As the electron is then closer to the nucleus, energy would be released. This flies in the face of everything I thought I understood about quantum mechanics and atomic structure. Is there a chance the person who wrote this article could add something discussing the possibility (or not) of fractional Rydberg numbers? WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 12:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Proposed merge
[edit]I propose merging the article Rydberg correction into this one, because it's a tiny stub lacking context. It would be easier to understand as part of this article. If nobody objects, I will come back in a month or so to do the merge. Reyk YO! 08:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- strong objection These are two completely different concepts. The Rydberg state is an inflated atom or molecule. The correction is a change to the energy of an electron due to non point charges. The Correction applies to all atomic states, including the ground state. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- Then what would you prefer to do with this badly sourced, contextless stub? Reyk YO! 02:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Closed, given that there is no support for the merge; there seems no doubt that article improvement is needed, hence the attention from an expert on the subject remains. Klbrain (talk) 21:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)