Talk:Aqueous Transmission: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Redirect" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WPSongs}}. Tag: |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{oldafdfull| date = 18 June 2009 (UTC) | result = '''redirect to [[Morning View]]''' | page = Aqueous Transmission }} |
|||
I removed the phrase "non-mainstream" from the article, let's face it, Incubus is not a 'non-mainstream' band. I love the song, don't get me wrong, but its by no means non-mainstream. we don't need imaginary 'street cred' to prove incubus has a good song here, lets remain neutral. |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Redirect| |
|||
{{WikiProject Songs}} |
|||
==Which Asian instrument?== |
|||
}} |
|||
The [[pipa]] article says the song uses a Chinese pipa. But the [[kokyu]] article now says it's a kokyu. Why did someone add this into the [[pipa]] article if it's an entirely different instrument? They're not even similar in sound: the kokyu produces a harsh viola-like sound while the pipa sounds like a brittle mandolin. Also, is it a Japanese kokyu or a Chinese erhu (sometimes called "kokyu" by the Japanese)? Where can I hear this (or see a photo of the instrument Einziger used) to make sure? [[User:Badagnani|Badagnani]] 20:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Oh, it was the band's mistake. It was a [[pipa]], not a kokyu. See http://incubus-online-view.com/iframe/faqs.php [[User:Badagnani|Badagnani]] 20:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:00, 25 January 2024
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 18 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Morning View. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
