Talk:Aqueous Transmission: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:00, 25 January 2024

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Morning View.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{oldafdfull| date = 18 June 2009 (UTC) | result = '''redirect to [[Morning View]]''' | page = Aqueous Transmission }}
-{{Songs|class=Start}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Redirect|
-{{sir}}
+{{WikiProject Songs}}
-I removed the phrase "non-mainstream" from the article, let's face it, Incubus is not a 'non-mainstream' band. I love the song, don't get me wrong, but its by no means non-mainstream. we don't need imaginary 'street cred' to prove incubus has a good song here, lets remain neutral.
+}}
-==Which Asian instrument?==
-The [[pipa]] article says the song uses a Chinese pipa.  But the [[kokyu]] article now says it's a kokyu.  Why did someone add this into the [[pipa]] article if it's an entirely different instrument?  They're not even similar in sound: the kokyu produces a harsh viola-like sound while the pipa sounds like a brittle mandolin.  Also, is it a Japanese kokyu or a Chinese erhu (sometimes called "kokyu" by the Japanese)?  Where can I hear this (or see a photo of the instrument Einziger used) to make sure?  [[User:Badagnani|Badagnani]] 20:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
-Oh, it was the band's mistake.  It was a [[pipa]], not a kokyu.  See http://incubus-online-view.com/iframe/faqs.php  [[User:Badagnani|Badagnani]] 20:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
-You may want a citation for that last part.