ChexSystems: Difference between revisions
Corrected category: Individual consumers are rated for creditworthiness not by credit rating agencies but by credit bureaus (also called consumer reporting agencies or credit reference agencies), which issue credit scores. |
→Response from banks: truist |
||
(38 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Credit reporting agency}}{{Use mdy dates|date=July 2017}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{Infobox company |
|||
| name = Chex Systems, Inc. |
|||
| logo = chex-systems-logo.png |
|||
| type = |
|||
| industry = Check and Customer Verification Systems |
|||
| fate = |
|||
| predecessor = <!-- or: | predecessors = --> |
|||
| successor = <!-- or: | successors = --> |
|||
| founded = <!-- {{Start date and age|1991}} --> |
|||
| founder = <!-- or: | founders = --> |
|||
| defunct = <!-- {{End date|YYYY|MM|DD}} --> |
|||
| hq_location_city = [[Woodbury, Minnesota]] |
|||
| hq_location_country = [[United States]] |
|||
| area_served = <!-- or: | areas_served = --> |
|||
| key_people = |
|||
| products = |
|||
| owner = <!-- or: | owners = --> |
|||
| num_employees = |
|||
| num_employees_year = <!-- Year of num_employees data (if known) --> |
|||
| parent = [[FIS (company)|FIS]] |
|||
| website = {{URL|chexsystems.com}} |
|||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
== History == |
|||
In 1991, the agency was owned by [[Deluxe Corporation]],<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/12729453/clipped_for_use_as_a_reference_in/|title=Bank database called unfair|last=<!--Staff-->|date=September 27, 1991|work=[[St. Cruz Sentin.|Santa Cruz Sentinel]]|access-date=July 29, 2017|page=B-6 col. 1}}</ref> and it was part of the spin-off from Deluxe that formed eFunds in 1999. Fidelity National Information Services acquired [[EFD (eFunds Corporation)|eFunds]] in 2007.<ref>Reuters.com [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-efunds-takeover-fidelitynational-idUSN2740575120070627 "Fidelity National to buy eFunds for $1.8 billion"]</ref> |
|||
The number of "bank and thrift branches" served in 1991 was 59,000.<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
== Services == |
== Services == |
||
Eighty percent of commercial [[bank]]s and [[credit unions]] in the [[United States]] use ChexSystems to screen applicants for checking and savings accounts.<ref>BankRate.com [http://www.bankrate.com/brm/green/chk/basics1-6a.asp Checking Basics] tutorial</ref> eFunds claims that their services are used in over 9,000 banks, including over 100,000 individual bank branches in the [[United States]]. Services include verification of identity, reports on account history, and transaction monitoring.<ref>[https://archive. |
Eighty percent of commercial [[bank]]s and [[credit unions]] in the [[United States]] use ChexSystems to screen applicants for checking and savings accounts.<ref>BankRate.com [http://www.bankrate.com/brm/green/chk/basics1-6a.asp Checking Basics] tutorial</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Starting Over in the U. S. After Getting Your Green Card|last=Baumgartner|first=Elzbieta|publisher=Polpress|year=2009|isbn=9780977045303|pages=157|oclc=312781285}}</ref> eFunds claims that their services are used in over 9,000 banks, including over 100,000 individual bank branches in the [[United States]]. As of 1991, ChexSystems held 7.3 million names of consumers whose bank accounts had been closed "for cause".<ref name=":0" /> Services include verification of identity, reports on account history, and transaction monitoring.<ref>[https://archive.today/20140618144959/http://www.fisglobal.com/products-riskfraudcompliance-riskmanagement eFunds Service Offerings]</ref> |
||
== Reporting == |
== Reporting == |
||
A ChexSystems report examines data submitted by banks in the past five years. A report may describe banking irregularities such as check [[overdraft]]s, unsettled balances, depositing [[Check kiting|fraudulent checks]], or suspicious account handling. Banks may refuse to open a new deposit account for a consumer that has a negative item reported. In 1999, ChexSystems was classified as a [[Credit bureau|consumer reporting agency]] governed by the [[Fair Credit Reporting Act]]. Therefore, consumers may retrieve a ChexSystems report annually, free of cost. They may dispute negative items and demand proof of the data contained in the report.<ref> |
A ChexSystems report examines data submitted by banks in the past five years. A report may describe banking irregularities such as check [[overdraft]]s, unsettled balances, depositing [[Check kiting|fraudulent checks]], or suspicious account handling. Banks may refuse to open a new deposit account for a consumer that has a negative item reported. In 1999, ChexSystems was classified as a [[Credit bureau|consumer reporting agency]] governed by the [[Fair Credit Reporting Act]]. Therefore, consumers may retrieve a ChexSystems report annually, free of cost. They may dispute negative items and demand proof of the data contained in the report.<ref>Banks.org [https://banks.org/banks-that-dont-use-chexsystems/ "Banks That Don’t Use ChexSystems"]</ref> |
||
== Criticism == |
== Criticism == |
||
[[Credit bureaus]] report both negative and positive information about a consumer's use of credit; a ChexSystems report specifies only negative information, if any, about a consumer's use of deposit accounts. Thus, if two customers have both made the same banking errors in the past, while one of them has maintained a number of positive banking relationships as well, both customers might be declined when applying for a new account. The [[Greenlining Institute]] has published a report indicating wide disparities in the criteria banks have used when deciding whether to report negative items to ChexSystems.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ncif.org/images/uploads/RFSI_StretegyGuide_Complete.pdf |title=From the Margins to the Mainstream: A Guide to Building Products and Strategies for Underbanked Markets |publisher=National Community Investment Fund |date=2008 | |
[[Credit bureaus]] report both negative and positive information about a consumer's use of credit; a ChexSystems report specifies only negative information, if any, about a consumer's use of deposit accounts. Thus, if two customers have both made the same banking errors in the past, while one of them has maintained a number of positive banking relationships as well, both customers might be declined when applying for a new account. A 1991 survey conducted by [[Consumer Action]] showed that ⅔ of California's largest financial institutions banned customers from opening accounts if they were listed with ChexSystems.<ref name=":0" /> The [[Greenlining Institute]] has published a report indicating wide disparities in the criteria banks have used when deciding whether to report negative items to ChexSystems.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ncif.org/images/uploads/RFSI_StretegyGuide_Complete.pdf |title=From the Margins to the Mainstream: A Guide to Building Products and Strategies for Underbanked Markets |publisher=National Community Investment Fund |date=2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120402160258/http://www.ncif.org/images/uploads/RFSI_StretegyGuide_Complete.pdf |archive-date=April 2, 2012 }}</ref> |
||
=== Response from banks === |
=== Response from banks === |
||
Beginning in August 2000, the Greenlining Institute, a public policy center headquartered in [[San Francisco]], and the [[Federal Reserve Bank]] of [[San Francisco]] held four meetings to discuss possible reform in the treatment of individuals reported to ChexSystems. These meetings included a discussion of potential best practices which a financial institution could implement to reduce its dependence on ChexSystems data in its decision process on opening accounts. Practices identified include: |
Beginning in August 2000, the Greenlining Institute, a public policy center headquartered in [[San Francisco]], and the [[Federal Reserve Bank]] of [[San Francisco]] held four meetings to discuss possible reform in the treatment of individuals reported to ChexSystems.{{Citation needed|date=July 2020}} These meetings included a discussion of potential best practices which a financial institution could implement to reduce its dependence on ChexSystems data in its decision process on opening accounts. Practices identified include: |
||
* Training staff to use judgment to assess risk when opening accounts |
* Training staff to use judgment to assess risk when opening accounts |
||
* Setting minimum limits to activate the use of ChexSystems |
* Setting minimum limits to activate the use of ChexSystems |
||
* Considering the possible override of a customer denial for situations that are beyond the customer’s control, such as a prolonged illness |
* Considering the possible override of a customer denial for situations that are beyond the customer’s control, such as a prolonged illness |
||
Since the meetings at the [[Federal Reserve Bank]] of [[San Francisco]], all participating financial institutions have announced that they will implement positive changes in the way they use ChexSystems.<ref> |
Since the meetings at the [[Federal Reserve Bank]] of [[San Francisco]], all participating financial institutions have announced that they will implement positive changes in the way they use ChexSystems.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://files.ots.treas.gov//48862.pdf |title=Office of Thrift Supervision |access-date=September 16, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721062522/http://files.ots.treas.gov//48862.pdf |archive-date=July 21, 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref> In September 2000, Bank of America was the first financial institution to announce specific changes in its use of ChexSystems. Revised practices include: |
||
* Disregarding all entries greater than three years old provided the entry is not fraud-related |
* Disregarding all entries greater than three years old, provided the entry is not fraud-related |
||
* Disregarding all entries greater than one year old if the consumer has repaid the debt |
* Disregarding all entries greater than one year old if the consumer has repaid the debt |
||
* Disregarding certain other entries if the consumer has repaid the debt and completes a course in financial responsibility |
* Disregarding certain other entries if the consumer has repaid the debt and completes a course in financial responsibility |
||
Line 27: | Line 55: | ||
* Increasing the length of time customers have to repay a negative balance from 30 days to 90 days |
* Increasing the length of time customers have to repay a negative balance from 30 days to 90 days |
||
* Improving the overdraft notification process to include more visible language that explains how the institution uses ChexSystems and the consequences of being reported |
* Improving the overdraft notification process to include more visible language that explains how the institution uses ChexSystems and the consequences of being reported |
||
* Refraining from reporting customers until numerous attempts have been to contact them and providing ample opportunity to settle their accounts before a report is submitted to ChexSystems<ref>[http://www.chicagofed.org/publications/profitwise/2002/pwwinter02.pdf Chicago Office of Education] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927093919/http://www.chicagofed.org/publications/profitwise/2002/pwwinter02.pdf |date=September 27, 2007 }}</ref> |
* Refraining from reporting customers until numerous attempts have been made to contact them and providing ample opportunity to settle their accounts before a report is submitted to ChexSystems<ref>[http://www.chicagofed.org/publications/profitwise/2002/pwwinter02.pdf Chicago Office of Education] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927093919/http://www.chicagofed.org/publications/profitwise/2002/pwwinter02.pdf |date=September 27, 2007 }}</ref> |
||
Some banks that use ChexSystems also utilize the services of Early Warning Services, LLC, a fraud prevention and consumer reporting agency owned by Bank of America, |
Some banks that use ChexSystems also utilize the services of Early Warning Services, LLC, a fraud prevention and consumer reporting agency owned by Bank of America, Truist, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo.<ref>[http://www.earlywarning.com/about.asp Early Warning Services, LLC] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100930031131/http://www.earlywarning.com/about.asp |date=September 30, 2010 }}</ref> Early Warning Services, LLC's website states, "Early Warning Services, LLC, is a fintech company owned by seven of the country’s largest banks." |
||
== References == |
== References == |
||
{{reflist|3}} |
{{reflist|3}} |
||
<!-- |
|||
Moved URL into the infobox |
|||
== External links == |
== External links == |
||
* [https://www.consumerdebit.com ChexSystems Consumer Assistance website] |
* [https://www.consumerdebit.com ChexSystems Consumer Assistance website] |
||
--> |
|||
{{Banking crime}} |
{{Banking crime}} |
||
Line 43: | Line 72: | ||
[[Category:Retail financial services]] |
[[Category:Retail financial services]] |
||
[[Category:Financial services companies of the United States]] |
[[Category:Financial services companies of the United States]] |
||
[[Category:Companies based in |
[[Category:Companies based in Minnesota]] |
||
[[Category:Non-sufficient funds]] |
[[Category:Non-sufficient funds]] |
Latest revision as of 18:20, 26 January 2024
Industry | Check and Customer Verification Systems |
---|---|
Headquarters | , |
Parent | FIS |
Website | chexsystems |
ChexSystems is an American check verification service and consumer reporting agency owned by the eFunds subsidiary of Fidelity National Information Services. It provides information about the use of deposit accounts by consumers.
History
[edit]In 1991, the agency was owned by Deluxe Corporation,[1] and it was part of the spin-off from Deluxe that formed eFunds in 1999. Fidelity National Information Services acquired eFunds in 2007.[2]
The number of "bank and thrift branches" served in 1991 was 59,000.[1]
Services
[edit]Eighty percent of commercial banks and credit unions in the United States use ChexSystems to screen applicants for checking and savings accounts.[3][4] eFunds claims that their services are used in over 9,000 banks, including over 100,000 individual bank branches in the United States. As of 1991, ChexSystems held 7.3 million names of consumers whose bank accounts had been closed "for cause".[1] Services include verification of identity, reports on account history, and transaction monitoring.[5]
Reporting
[edit]A ChexSystems report examines data submitted by banks in the past five years. A report may describe banking irregularities such as check overdrafts, unsettled balances, depositing fraudulent checks, or suspicious account handling. Banks may refuse to open a new deposit account for a consumer that has a negative item reported. In 1999, ChexSystems was classified as a consumer reporting agency governed by the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Therefore, consumers may retrieve a ChexSystems report annually, free of cost. They may dispute negative items and demand proof of the data contained in the report.[6]
Criticism
[edit]Credit bureaus report both negative and positive information about a consumer's use of credit; a ChexSystems report specifies only negative information, if any, about a consumer's use of deposit accounts. Thus, if two customers have both made the same banking errors in the past, while one of them has maintained a number of positive banking relationships as well, both customers might be declined when applying for a new account. A 1991 survey conducted by Consumer Action showed that ⅔ of California's largest financial institutions banned customers from opening accounts if they were listed with ChexSystems.[1] The Greenlining Institute has published a report indicating wide disparities in the criteria banks have used when deciding whether to report negative items to ChexSystems.[7]
Response from banks
[edit]Beginning in August 2000, the Greenlining Institute, a public policy center headquartered in San Francisco, and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco held four meetings to discuss possible reform in the treatment of individuals reported to ChexSystems.[citation needed] These meetings included a discussion of potential best practices which a financial institution could implement to reduce its dependence on ChexSystems data in its decision process on opening accounts. Practices identified include:
- Training staff to use judgment to assess risk when opening accounts
- Setting minimum limits to activate the use of ChexSystems
- Considering the possible override of a customer denial for situations that are beyond the customer’s control, such as a prolonged illness
Since the meetings at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, all participating financial institutions have announced that they will implement positive changes in the way they use ChexSystems.[8] In September 2000, Bank of America was the first financial institution to announce specific changes in its use of ChexSystems. Revised practices include:
- Disregarding all entries greater than three years old, provided the entry is not fraud-related
- Disregarding all entries greater than one year old if the consumer has repaid the debt
- Disregarding certain other entries if the consumer has repaid the debt and completes a course in financial responsibility
- Increasing the loss threshold for reporting closed accounts from $50 to $100 in overdrafts
- Increasing the length of time a customer has to repay the debt
During a December 2000 meeting, Bank of America reported that in the first two months under the revised standards, its new ChexSystems policies had resulted in approximately 1,800 "overrides". This allowed 1,800 individuals to open deposit accounts that would have been denied under the bank's former policies. Best practices to address the barriers ChexSystems reports may create for low-and moderate-income individuals include:
- Increasing the negative balance threshold for reporting customers from $25 to $100
- Increasing the length of time customers have to repay a negative balance from 30 days to 90 days
- Improving the overdraft notification process to include more visible language that explains how the institution uses ChexSystems and the consequences of being reported
- Refraining from reporting customers until numerous attempts have been made to contact them and providing ample opportunity to settle their accounts before a report is submitted to ChexSystems[9]
Some banks that use ChexSystems also utilize the services of Early Warning Services, LLC, a fraud prevention and consumer reporting agency owned by Bank of America, Truist, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo.[10] Early Warning Services, LLC's website states, "Early Warning Services, LLC, is a fintech company owned by seven of the country’s largest banks."
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d "Bank database called unfair". Santa Cruz Sentinel. September 27, 1991. p. B-6 col. 1. Retrieved July 29, 2017.
- ^ Reuters.com "Fidelity National to buy eFunds for $1.8 billion"
- ^ BankRate.com Checking Basics tutorial
- ^ Baumgartner, Elzbieta (2009). Starting Over in the U. S. After Getting Your Green Card. Polpress. p. 157. ISBN 9780977045303. OCLC 312781285.
- ^ eFunds Service Offerings
- ^ Banks.org "Banks That Don’t Use ChexSystems"
- ^ "From the Margins to the Mainstream: A Guide to Building Products and Strategies for Underbanked Markets" (PDF). National Community Investment Fund. 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 2, 2012.
- ^ "Office of Thrift Supervision" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 21, 2011. Retrieved September 16, 2008.
- ^ Chicago Office of Education Archived September 27, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Early Warning Services, LLC Archived September 30, 2010, at the Wayback Machine