Jump to content

Talk:Expressive power (computer science): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Stevertigo (talk | contribs)
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject Computing|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Computer science|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Computer science|importance=low}}
}}


==Untitled==
The term ''idea'' in the first sentence is unfortunate. The notion of expressive power is quite a bit more mathematically tangible than the term ''idea'' suggests. [[User:Rp|Rp]] ([[User talk:Rp|talk]]) 23:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
The term ''idea'' in the first sentence is unfortunate. The notion of expressive power is quite a bit more mathematically tangible than the term ''idea'' suggests. [[User:Rp|Rp]] ([[User talk:Rp|talk]]) 23:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

== Concepts, not ideas ==

I think the word "idea" is too informal to be used here. "Concept" on the other hand is a standard term when discussing the semantics of programming languages, so I propose to replace "idea" with "concept" throughout. [[User:Rp|Rp]] ([[User talk:Rp|talk]]) 16:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:12, 26 January 2024

Untitled

[edit]

The term idea in the first sentence is unfortunate. The notion of expressive power is quite a bit more mathematically tangible than the term idea suggests. Rp (talk) 23:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concepts, not ideas

[edit]

I think the word "idea" is too informal to be used here. "Concept" on the other hand is a standard term when discussing the semantics of programming languages, so I propose to replace "idea" with "concept" throughout. Rp (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]