Talk:Balnagowan House: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
adding WikiProjects |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Ireland}}, {{WikiProject Architecture}}. Tag: |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Ireland|importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Architecture|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{WPUKIR10k}} |
|||
I would seriously question whether this building meets the notability guidelines set out by Wikipedia, some of the information in the article is blatantly incorrect and overly detailed on irrelevant family background information.[[User:Financefactz|Financefactz]] ([[User talk:Financefactz|talk]]) 01:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:{{replyto|Financefactz}} could you point to some of the "blatantly incorrect" statements? Biased as I am, it is not unusual for the history of the designers, builders and occupiers to be included in an article on a building, especially a home. The reason I included the occupants was to document the material changes to the building over time. [[User:Smirkybec|Smirkybec]] ([[User talk:Smirkybec|talk]]) 11:44, 15 August 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::Is there a chance of walking around the house my great grandad built g linzell [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7E:3056:9800:541C:A3F8:15FB:D58F|2A02:C7E:3056:9800:541C:A3F8:15FB:D58F]] ([[User talk:2A02:C7E:3056:9800:541C:A3F8:15FB:D58F|talk]]) 14:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:03, 27 January 2024
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
I would seriously question whether this building meets the notability guidelines set out by Wikipedia, some of the information in the article is blatantly incorrect and overly detailed on irrelevant family background information.Financefactz (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Financefactz: could you point to some of the "blatantly incorrect" statements? Biased as I am, it is not unusual for the history of the designers, builders and occupiers to be included in an article on a building, especially a home. The reason I included the occupants was to document the material changes to the building over time. Smirkybec (talk) 11:44, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Is there a chance of walking around the house my great grandad built g linzell 2A02:C7E:3056:9800:541C:A3F8:15FB:D58F (talk) 14:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)