Jump to content

Talk:Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(40 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
== EDGE stands for ... ==
{{WikiProject Telecommunications}}
}}
{{merged-from|Evolved EDGE|date=2016-03-14|talk=no}}
{{archives|banner=yes|auto=yes|search=yes}}


== External links modified ==
Hi all! Why is "... GLOBAL evolution" used here as the long name for EDGE? It is ".. GSM evolution" as I have just checked in 3GPP TS 21.905-6.7.0 (2004-06), the document defining "Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications". The "...global evolution" I have found on the 3GPP server only in some old documents dated 1999 and 2000. As I have not yet the permission to change a Lemma, can somebody else please do it. thanks --[[User:Fortythree|Fortythree]] 15:55, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
:I will move it to the standard name according to [http://www.gsmworld.com/technology/edge/index.shtml the GSM Association]. Global Evolution is an outdated term. [[User:Cacophony|Cacophony]] July 8, 2005 20:04 (UTC)


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
== US providers ==


I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=709330019 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
Are there any U.S. celluar providers who are using EDGE? I see GPRS and EVDO offered by TMobile and Verizon.
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080414072112/http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/imt-2000/MiscDocuments/IMT-Deployments-Rev3.pdf to http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/imt-2000/MiscDocuments/IMT-Deployments-Rev3.pdf


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
:Cingular currently offers EDGE in some markets. T-Mobile is in the process of rolling out EDGE. [[User:Cacophony|Cacophony]] 15:39, May 26, 2005 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
== move the list? ==


Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 09:18, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Should we move the list to [[List of EDGE networks]]? Right now the list is longer than the article. [[User:Cacophony|Cacophony]] 19:37, 19 March 2006 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
Most operators now have EDGE, so this list might even be useless. Maybe we should list operators that do not provide EDGE ?
[[User:AlexandreAmant|AlexandreAmant]] ([[User talk:AlexandreAmant|talk]]) 22:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
== edge, grps and hscsd ==


I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=738925735 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
The beginning of the article leaves me with impression that Edge only boosts the speed of Gprs but it is possible to run Hscsd over Edge. [[User:Ltxxx|Ltxxx]] 15:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090306095648/http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/imt-2000/DocumentsIMT2000/IMT-2000.pdf to http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/imt-2000/DocumentsIMT2000/IMT-2000.pdf


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
No: Hscsd is a circuit switched technology (CS) as GPRS or EDGE are Packet switched (PS). [[User:AlexandreAmant|AlexandreAmant]] ([[User talk:AlexandreAmant|talk]]) 23:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
== disorganized ==


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 20:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
To me, this article seems very poorly organised. I cannot follow it. I do not know anything on the subject else I would try to re-write some of it myself.


== Upload ? ==
== External links modified ==


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
The upload capacity of EGRPS (and EHCSD) is not stated.


I have just modified {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on [[Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=756479817 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
== List of commercial websites?? ==
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081021132523/http://www.3gamericas.org:80/English/About_3G_Americas/ to http://www.3gamericas.org/English/About%5F3G%5FAmericas/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130306012136/http://www.visantstrategies.com:80/market_research/edge_evolution_egprs_evolved.html to http://www.visantstrategies.com/market_research/edge_evolution_egprs_evolved.html


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
This article has a lot of commercial websites embedded links. Please remove these link, per [[WP:NOT]]. &mdash; [[User:Indon|Indon]] ([[User_talk:Indon |<font color="green">reply</font>]]) &mdash; 10:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
== cleanup comments in [[{{SUBJECTSPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}#Networks]] ==


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 15:05, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
I added the sprawling lists, proseline, contradictory section and uncited section templates to this section for the following reasons:
*The list appears to have been edited by multiple individuals by appending new networks as and when EDGE support was introduced, hence, [[Wikipedia:Proseline|proseline]].
*Amongst other contradictions, T-Mobile is said to have good edge coverage in Croatia and the Czech Republic, but later said to only have EDGE support in parts of Germany. If this refers to different divisions of T-Mobile, it is unclear ie. the links should use the whole company name (ie. [[T-Mobile|T-Mobile Czech Republic]])
*Where is this information taken from? is it recent and/or accurate?
*The list requires general clean-up; it is unsightly, poorly ordered, and hard to read. Information is hard to find. <p>Thanks, '''[[User:Jonaboff|Jonaboff]]<sub>''[[User_talk:Jonaboff|talk]]''</sub>'''</p> 23:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


== Lists of EDGE in Europe ==
== External links modified ==


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
This list does not seem to be correct? there is no EDGE in the UK. Many European operators announced EDGE in the late 90's but due to the costs of 3g they never implemented EDGE chosing to remain at GPRS. Does anybody have a real uptodate list? --[[User:Rbaal|Rbaal]] 06:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


I have just modified 3 external links on [[Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=792402143 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
Personally I think the list is pointless (and in its current incarnation useless) and should simply be stricken. If someone needs to find out if a network has EDGE they can just check out the providers page. Perhaps some blanket statement can be made like "many operators who had early deployments of UMTS have foregone EDGE" (as seems to be the case in the UK as stated above, and Sweden IME), if someone can find a source for it [[User:Kalleboo|Kalleboo]] 13:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091007091901/http://developer.att.com/devcentral/tools_technologies/network/docs/DataCapabilities_GPRS__to_HSDPA.pdf to http://developer.att.com/devcentral/tools_technologies/network/docs/DataCapabilities_GPRS__to_HSDPA.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.3gamericas.org/English/About_3G_Americas/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.visantstrategies.com/market_research/edge_evolution_egprs_evolved.html


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Seems O2 has quietly rolled out EDGE in the UK - my Blackberry is currently sat on the EDGE network while sat in my office in Somerset - our reps are also reporting EDGE connections throughout the country. Speculation is that preparation for the (alleged) iPhone-O2 partnering deal has started [[User:Pharazon|Pharazon]] 16:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
== 2.75G Redirect -- Eurocentric? ==
Currently, the Page for CDMA2000 refers to 1xRTT as being a "2.75G" technology, with a link to the "2.75G" article -- which redirects to this page about GSM technology. Clicking on a link in a CDMA article that ostensibly talks about data transmission in a CDMA (or at least access neutral) context and ending up on a GSM-specific page is disorienting at best, and horribly misleading in the worst case. [[User:AdamRoach|AdamRoach]] 21:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 09:06, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
== Egypt.. ==

Egypt is stated in both, Africa and Middle East. In Africa, it is stated that Egypt Mobinil tried to implement EDGE and failed. In Middle East, it is stated that in Egypt, Vodafone, Mobinil and Etisalat implement EDGE. This is a contradiction! [[User:Sabb0ur|Sabb0ur]] 01:31, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

== External links ==
http://www.ericsson.com/products/white_papers_pdf/edge_wp_technical.pdf is not reachable. Is there an other pdf elsewhere from ERICSSON?
==

== EDGE is not 3G ==

This was readded by an anonymous user: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Enhanced_Data_Rates_for_GSM_Evolution&action=edit&undoafter=198717341&undo=199166154

I undid it.

There is no reference, and EDGE isn't actually a 3G technology as it operates as a 2G (GSM) bolt-on. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:JimpsEd|JimpsEd]] ([[User talk:JimpsEd|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JimpsEd|contribs]]) 20:25, 18 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:According to the article [[3G]], the ITU defined six technologies forming 3G networking, in its [[IMT-2000]] standard, EDGE (not even EDGE Evolution) being one of them: So, what to do? Thyl Engelhardt [[Special:Contributions/213.70.217.172|213.70.217.172]] ([[User talk:213.70.217.172|talk]]) 11:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:18, 27 January 2024

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:18, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:05, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]