Talk:Mumbai FC

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mumbai F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121026070612/http://www.mumbaifc.com/MumbaiFC2012/History.aspx to http://mumbaifc.com/MumbaiFC2012/History.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141101231314/http://www.indiablooms.com/SportsDetailsPage/2011/sportsDetails140511d.php to http://www.indiablooms.com/SportsDetailsPage/2011/sportsDetails140511d.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170629212639/http://www.news4education.com/article.php?id=2978 to http://www.news4education.com/article.php?id=2978

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 17 August 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 21:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

---

Mumbai F.C. → Mumbai FC – Consistency with current naming conventions in Category:Football clubs in India , Category:Indian Super League teams and so on. 14:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)~~

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

• Oppose - one of a mass number of nominations by this editor (at least 16 by my count?!) with no sources presented and no clear category convention to match. GiantSnowman 11:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Many Indian Football Club article titles have FC or SC or AC, But Some Indian Football Club article titles have F.C. or S.C. or A.C. So In order to unify disordered article titles, I requested many title moves. What's wrong with that?

• Support for consistency. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 20:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
• Support for consistency. I was the one who actually moved a lot of these articles since Indian clubs en masse do not use the "." in FC, SC, AC etc. Most likely, the articles were titled like that due to original editors copying what is done with the Premier League. The Indian Super League itself doesn't add dots, and neither does the I-League. All other clubs have social media and some news coverage which never uses the dots. The Times of India doesn't use it, outlook india doesn't and even The Hindu does not include them. It's literally something that just does not exist in India or used besides on some wikipedia articles. Makes no sense to include. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 21:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.