Talk:P-800 Oniks: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Tag: |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader}} |
|||
{{WPAVIATION|class=stub|auto=yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|||
{{WPMILHIST |
|||
{{WikiProject Military history|class= Start|b1=n|b2=n|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|Weaponry-task-force= yes}} |
|||
|class= Stub |
|||
<!-- Task force tags --> |
|||
|Weaponry-task-force= yes |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
| Line 12: | Line 10: | ||
There is no proof Hezbollah is a future operator. There is only unproven claims from one unaffiliated country about what that country thinks might happen.--[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 18:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC) |
There is no proof Hezbollah is a future operator. There is only unproven claims from one unaffiliated country about what that country thinks might happen.--[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 18:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
Syria has 14 Su-27SK, assuming they bought the centreline adapter they can definitely launch the P-800. |
Syria has 14 Su-27SK, assuming they bought the centreline adapter they can definitely launch the P-800. 02:50, 26 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
The link to Reference No.2 is broken [[User:Miguel.A.Lopez.Regalado|Miguel.A.Lopez.Regalado]] ([[User talk:Miguel.A.Lopez.Regalado|talk]]) 13:58, 2 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Turkey air bases == |
|||
" Anir1uph (talk | contribs) . . (6,926 bytes) (-105) . . (Reverted to revision 564465034 by Green Cardamom: that info not important, nor is it confirmed. Turkey denies this. so adding it as a fact is not appropriate, IMO" |
|||
Israel fighter jet coming from Turkey to bomb Syria is not important? Well not confirmed yes, but not important??? |
|||
.... :D:D:D:D:D |
|||
I 'm really curious in which world wikipedia's moderators leave :D |
|||
You know in order to write/edit/delete a matter with geopolitical aspect you must have at least a basic idea about current geopolitical status, official statements, coalitions and generally the status quo :D:D:D [[User:Ypovoleas|Ypovoleas]] ([[User talk:Ypovoleas|talk]]) 10:12, 20 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Please do not open the same thread at multiple locations, as you did here and at my talk page. I have already replied there. It is at [[User talk:Anir1uph#Not important.3F :D]]. [[User:Anir1uph|Anir1uph]] | [[User talk:Anir1uph#top|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Anir1uph|contrib]] 17:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Hezbollah == |
|||
Might be time to add Hezbollah in the operators list: |
|||
*http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/01/03/why-hezbollahs-new-missiles-are-a-problem-for-israel/ |
|||
*http://warisboring.com/articles/hezbollah-may-come-out-of-the-syrian-civil-war-stronger-than-ever/ |
|||
[[User:Code16|<span style="color:white; background:black">c<span style="background:white;border-radius:7px;color:black">Ө</span>de1+6</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Code16|<i style="color:black">TP </i>]]</sup> 15:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Thermonuclear? == |
|||
The article states that there is a thermonuclear warhead option. Is that correct? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/107.131.126.149|107.131.126.149]] ([[User talk:107.131.126.149#top|talk]]) 23:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Yes, that is correct. -- [[User:Nicholas_Velasquez|Nicholas Velasquez]] ([[User talk:Nicholas Velasquez|talk]]) 11:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:50, 28 January 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the P-800 Oniks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Syria
[edit]Syria now is a current operator .. and the deal is completed .. I think we should update that. Dr B2 (talk) 17:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
There is no proof Hezbollah is a future operator. There is only unproven claims from one unaffiliated country about what that country thinks might happen.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Syria has 14 Su-27SK, assuming they bought the centreline adapter they can definitely launch the P-800. 02:50, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
The link to Reference No.2 is broken Miguel.A.Lopez.Regalado (talk) 13:58, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Turkey air bases
[edit]" Anir1uph (talk | contribs) . . (6,926 bytes) (-105) . . (Reverted to revision 564465034 by Green Cardamom: that info not important, nor is it confirmed. Turkey denies this. so adding it as a fact is not appropriate, IMO"
Israel fighter jet coming from Turkey to bomb Syria is not important? Well not confirmed yes, but not important??? .... :D:D:D:D:D
I 'm really curious in which world wikipedia's moderators leave :D You know in order to write/edit/delete a matter with geopolitical aspect you must have at least a basic idea about current geopolitical status, official statements, coalitions and generally the status quo :D:D:D Ypovoleas (talk) 10:12, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
- Please do not open the same thread at multiple locations, as you did here and at my talk page. I have already replied there. It is at User talk:Anir1uph#Not important.3F :D. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 17:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Hezbollah
[edit]Might be time to add Hezbollah in the operators list:
- http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/01/03/why-hezbollahs-new-missiles-are-a-problem-for-israel/
- http://warisboring.com/articles/hezbollah-may-come-out-of-the-syrian-civil-war-stronger-than-ever/
cӨde1+6TP 15:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Thermonuclear?
[edit]The article states that there is a thermonuclear warhead option. Is that correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.131.126.149 (talk) 23:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, that is correct. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 11:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)