Jump to content

Talk:P-800 Oniks: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
tag
 
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{WPMILHIST
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
|class=
{{WikiProject Military history|class= Start|b1=n|b2=n|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|Weaponry-task-force= yes}}
<!-- Task force tags -->
|Weaponry-task-force= yes
}}
}}

== Syria ==

Syria now is a current operator .. and the deal is completed .. I think we should update that. [[User:Dr B2|Dr B2]] ([[User talk:Dr B2|talk]]) 17:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

There is no proof Hezbollah is a future operator. There is only unproven claims from one unaffiliated country about what that country thinks might happen.--[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 18:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Syria has 14 Su-27SK, assuming they bought the centreline adapter they can definitely launch the P-800. 02:50, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

The link to Reference No.2 is broken [[User:Miguel.A.Lopez.Regalado|Miguel.A.Lopez.Regalado]] ([[User talk:Miguel.A.Lopez.Regalado|talk]]) 13:58, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

== Turkey air bases ==
" Anir1uph (talk | contribs)‎ . . (6,926 bytes) (-105)‎ . . (Reverted to revision 564465034 by Green Cardamom: that info not important, nor is it confirmed. Turkey denies this. so adding it as a fact is not appropriate, IMO"

Israel fighter jet coming from Turkey to bomb Syria is not important? Well not confirmed yes, but not important???
.... :D:D:D:D:D

I 'm really curious in which world wikipedia's moderators leave :D
You know in order to write/edit/delete a matter with geopolitical aspect you must have at least a basic idea about current geopolitical status, official statements, coalitions and generally the status quo :D:D:D [[User:Ypovoleas|Ypovoleas]] ([[User talk:Ypovoleas|talk]]) 10:12, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

:Please do not open the same thread at multiple locations, as you did here and at my talk page. I have already replied there. It is at [[User talk:Anir1uph#Not important.3F :D]]. [[User:Anir1uph|Anir1uph]] &#124; [[User talk:Anir1uph#top|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Anir1uph|contrib]] 17:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

== Hezbollah ==
Might be time to add Hezbollah in the operators list:
*http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/01/03/why-hezbollahs-new-missiles-are-a-problem-for-israel/
*http://warisboring.com/articles/hezbollah-may-come-out-of-the-syrian-civil-war-stronger-than-ever/
[[User:Code16|<span style="color:white; background:black">c<span style="background:white;border-radius:7px;color:black">Ө</span>de1+6</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Code16|<i style="color:black">TP </i>]]</sup> 15:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

== Thermonuclear? ==

The article states that there is a thermonuclear warhead option. Is that correct? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/107.131.126.149|107.131.126.149]] ([[User talk:107.131.126.149#top|talk]]) 23:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Yes, that is correct. -- [[User:Nicholas_Velasquez|Nicholas Velasquez]] ([[User talk:Nicholas Velasquez|talk]]) 11:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:50, 28 January 2024

Syria

[edit]

Syria now is a current operator .. and the deal is completed .. I think we should update that. Dr B2 (talk) 17:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no proof Hezbollah is a future operator. There is only unproven claims from one unaffiliated country about what that country thinks might happen.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Syria has 14 Su-27SK, assuming they bought the centreline adapter they can definitely launch the P-800. 02:50, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

The link to Reference No.2 is broken Miguel.A.Lopez.Regalado (talk) 13:58, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey air bases

[edit]

" Anir1uph (talk | contribs)‎ . . (6,926 bytes) (-105)‎ . . (Reverted to revision 564465034 by Green Cardamom: that info not important, nor is it confirmed. Turkey denies this. so adding it as a fact is not appropriate, IMO"

Israel fighter jet coming from Turkey to bomb Syria is not important? Well not confirmed yes, but not important??? .... :D:D:D:D:D

I 'm really curious in which world wikipedia's moderators leave :D You know in order to write/edit/delete a matter with geopolitical aspect you must have at least a basic idea about current geopolitical status, official statements, coalitions and generally the status quo :D:D:D Ypovoleas (talk) 10:12, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not open the same thread at multiple locations, as you did here and at my talk page. I have already replied there. It is at User talk:Anir1uph#Not important.3F :D. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 17:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hezbollah

[edit]

Might be time to add Hezbollah in the operators list:

cӨde1+6TP 15:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thermonuclear?

[edit]

The article states that there is a thermonuclear warhead option. Is that correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.131.126.149 (talk) 23:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is correct. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 11:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]