Talk:Understanding Poetry: Difference between revisions
→Paraphrases: new section |
Tag: |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Books|needs-infobox=yes}} |
||
}} |
|||
== Paraphrases == |
== Paraphrases == |
||
I'm concerned that much of this article appears to be very close paraphrases of the original subject. Could this perhaps be addressed? [[User:RomanSpa|RomanSpa]] ([[User talk:RomanSpa|talk]]) 07:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC) |
I'm concerned that much of this article appears to be very close paraphrases of the original subject. Could this perhaps be addressed? [[User:RomanSpa|RomanSpa]] ([[User talk:RomanSpa|talk]]) 07:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Summary needs to be cleaned up == |
|||
The detailed division of the section delineating the book's contents is unnecessary and should probably be eliminated. As it is, there are sub-headings with nothing under them, and if all of those were filled out, the section as a whole would be much too long. I have eliminated the last sub-heading, which referred to the index, since that was the only one which contained obviously gratuitous information, but since I haven't actually read ''Understanding Poetry'' and thus don't know what deserves to be kept and what sub-headings might be appropriate, I'm afraid to tamper with the rest. But someone else familiar with the book should definitely do so. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Wolfinator`|Wolfinator`]] ([[User talk:Wolfinator`|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wolfinator`|contribs]]) 23:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Latest revision as of 22:45, 28 January 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Paraphrases
[edit]I'm concerned that much of this article appears to be very close paraphrases of the original subject. Could this perhaps be addressed? RomanSpa (talk) 07:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Summary needs to be cleaned up
[edit]The detailed division of the section delineating the book's contents is unnecessary and should probably be eliminated. As it is, there are sub-headings with nothing under them, and if all of those were filled out, the section as a whole would be much too long. I have eliminated the last sub-heading, which referred to the index, since that was the only one which contained obviously gratuitous information, but since I haven't actually read Understanding Poetry and thus don't know what deserves to be kept and what sub-headings might be appropriate, I'm afraid to tamper with the rest. But someone else familiar with the book should definitely do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfinator` (talk • contribs) 23:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)