Talk:Victor Biaka Boda: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m update WP Bio priority tag |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}. Tag: |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|living=no|listas=Boda, Vivtor Biaka| |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=low |
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=low|auto=yes}} |
||
|living=no |
|||
|class=Stub |
|||
|auto=yes |
|||
|listas=Boda, Vivtor Biaka |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
This article should include text from the French language Wikipedia : https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Biaka_Boda |
|||
The French article is much more informative, cites the actual circumstances of his death, and does not propagate the myth that he was eaten. Arguably this story violates NPOV. Given that the myth is widely known it should probably be the subject of a specific section but it should be called out that there is no reason to think it is real. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.36.109.103|82.36.109.103]] ([[User talk:82.36.109.103#top|talk]]) 09:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Latest revision as of 02:13, 29 January 2024
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article should include text from the French language Wikipedia : https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Biaka_Boda
The French article is much more informative, cites the actual circumstances of his death, and does not propagate the myth that he was eaten. Arguably this story violates NPOV. Given that the myth is widely known it should probably be the subject of a specific section but it should be called out that there is no reason to think it is real. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.109.103 (talk) 09:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)