Jump to content

Talk:Buku Jingga: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
Bots
7,106,680 edits
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Articles for creation}}, {{WikiProject Malaysia}}.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=C|ts=20111220125254|reviewer=Chzz}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Malaysia}}
{{WikiProject Articles for creation |ts=20111220125254 |reviewer=Chzz}}
{{WikiProject Malaysia |importance=Mid}}
}}


== 4 new sources by Rehab Junkie ==
== 4 new sources by Rehab Junkie ==


I've included one of the four new sources. The other three look dubious. From those sources it seems that Dr. Azizan Abdul Razak did say that Kedah's government does not have to follow Buku Jingga, but he later qualified that position with both PAS's and PR's leaders and they have come out with a statement supporting Buku Jingga ("However, Anwar stressed that all Pakatan parties must give due recognition to the Buku Jingga as the points had been collectively agreed upon" - from one of the sources). It sounds like there was a misunderstanding, which is not something I think is worth including in the article. Whether or not there is a rift in Pakatan Rakyat has nothing to do with Buku Jingga, so I have not included that. Finally there is the argument that Felda will go bankrupt, but that article is strangely barren. It doesn't say why Felda going bankrupt is a bad thing. It says that "1.6 million second-generation settlers would only get about 1ha each compared to the 10ha given to their grandfathers, who were the original settlers", but it doesn't say why this is not to be desired either. I do not get whatever point that article is trying to make. If it is criticizing Buku Jingga, it is certainly not doing so strongly, so I have not included that either. [[User:Banedon|Banedon]] ([[User talk:Banedon|talk]]) 03:01, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
I've included one of the four new sources. The other three look dubious. From those sources it seems that Dr. Azizan Abdul Razak did say that Kedah's government does not have to follow Buku Jingga, but he later qualified that position with both PAS's and PR's leaders and they have come out with a statement supporting Buku Jingga ("However, Anwar stressed that all Pakatan parties must give due recognition to the Buku Jingga as the points had been collectively agreed upon" - from one of the sources). It sounds like there was a misunderstanding, which is not something I think is worth including in the article. Whether or not there is a rift in Pakatan Rakyat has nothing to do with Buku Jingga, so I have not included that. Finally there is the argument that Felda will go bankrupt, but that article is strangely barren. It doesn't say why Felda going bankrupt is a bad thing. It says that "1.6 million second-generation settlers would only get about 1ha each compared to the 10ha given to their grandfathers, who were the original settlers", but it doesn't say why this is not to be desired either. I do not get whatever point that article is trying to make. If it is criticizing Buku Jingga, it is certainly not doing so strongly, so I have not included that either. [[User:Banedon|Banedon]] ([[User talk:Banedon|talk]]) 03:01, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on [[Buku Jingga]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=792577211 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111228154755/http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/09/25/pakatan-will-go-orange-not-green-says-guan-eng/ to http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/09/25/pakatan-will-go-orange-not-green-says-guan-eng/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130323051650/http://www.pas.org.my/v2/index.php/info/misi-dasar-seruan to http://www.pas.org.my/v2/index.php/info/misi-dasar-seruan

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 09:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:45, 29 January 2024

4 new sources by Rehab Junkie

[edit]

I've included one of the four new sources. The other three look dubious. From those sources it seems that Dr. Azizan Abdul Razak did say that Kedah's government does not have to follow Buku Jingga, but he later qualified that position with both PAS's and PR's leaders and they have come out with a statement supporting Buku Jingga ("However, Anwar stressed that all Pakatan parties must give due recognition to the Buku Jingga as the points had been collectively agreed upon" - from one of the sources). It sounds like there was a misunderstanding, which is not something I think is worth including in the article. Whether or not there is a rift in Pakatan Rakyat has nothing to do with Buku Jingga, so I have not included that. Finally there is the argument that Felda will go bankrupt, but that article is strangely barren. It doesn't say why Felda going bankrupt is a bad thing. It says that "1.6 million second-generation settlers would only get about 1ha each compared to the 10ha given to their grandfathers, who were the original settlers", but it doesn't say why this is not to be desired either. I do not get whatever point that article is trying to make. If it is criticizing Buku Jingga, it is certainly not doing so strongly, so I have not included that either. Banedon (talk) 03:01, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Buku Jingga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Buku_Jingga&oldid=1200434544"