Talk:Canonisation of John Henry Newman: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ian Spackman (talk | contribs) |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Christianity}}. Tag: |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
|||
{{WikiProject Christianity|importance=low|catholicism=yes|catholicism-importance=mid}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Article title== |
==Article title== |
||
[[Canonization of John Henry Newman]] may become the correct title for this article if and (probably) when he is canonised: but as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball would it not be better to move it in the meantime to ‘Proposed…’ or ‘Cause for…’? [[User:Ian Spackman|Ian Spackman]] ([[User talk:Ian Spackman|talk]]) 12:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC) |
[[Canonization of John Henry Newman]] may become the correct title for this article if and (probably) when he is canonised: but as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball would it not be better to move it in the meantime to ‘Proposed…’ or ‘Cause for…’? [[User:Ian Spackman|Ian Spackman]] ([[User talk:Ian Spackman|talk]]) 12:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 8: | ||
::Perhaps I am being a bit pedantic; and I don’t see it as an ''enormous'' problem ;-) [[User:Ian Spackman|Ian Spackman]] ([[User talk:Ian Spackman|talk]]) 10:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC) |
::Perhaps I am being a bit pedantic; and I don’t see it as an ''enormous'' problem ;-) [[User:Ian Spackman|Ian Spackman]] ([[User talk:Ian Spackman|talk]]) 10:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
'''Cause for Canonisation of John Henry Newman''' would be a better title at this time. If the cause succeeds (as it well may) it can be moved back. [[User:Jonathunder|Jonathunder]] ([[User talk:Jonathunder|talk]]) 17:35, 29 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
==External link== |
|||
The link to the site for Newman's canonization cause is dead or somehow expired, since all of the content is spamlike. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/65.182.240.18|65.182.240.18]] ([[User talk:65.182.240.18#top|talk]]) 05:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:I have removed it. [[Special:Contributions/142.160.131.202|142.160.131.202]] ([[User talk:142.160.131.202|talk]]) 03:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 21:49, 29 January 2024
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Article title
[edit]Canonization of John Henry Newman may become the correct title for this article if and (probably) when he is canonised: but as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball would it not be better to move it in the meantime to ‘Proposed…’ or ‘Cause for…’? Ian Spackman (talk) 12:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Technically you are right but I still think it works better as short-hand for the canonisation process. Otherwise we'll end up with 'Cause for the possible canonisation of Cardinal John Henry Newman' which seems rather a mouthful. But not opposed if others think it is more correct. Contaldo80 (talk) 10:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps I am being a bit pedantic; and I don’t see it as an enormous problem ;-) Ian Spackman (talk) 10:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Cause for Canonisation of John Henry Newman would be a better title at this time. If the cause succeeds (as it well may) it can be moved back. Jonathunder (talk) 17:35, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
External link
[edit]The link to the site for Newman's canonization cause is dead or somehow expired, since all of the content is spamlike. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.182.240.18 (talk) 05:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- I have removed it. 142.160.131.202 (talk) 03:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)