Talk:Culture-historical archaeology: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m assessment, Replaced: {{ArchaeologyWikiProject . {{ArchaeologyWikiProject|class=st using AWB |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Archaeology}}. Tag: |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
||
{{WikiProject Archaeology|importance=Top}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== Single Source == |
|||
The article is based on a single source (Trigger 2007), referenced 11 times. This is rather problematic for an article about a potentially polemic subject, isn't it? [[User:Denispir|Denispir]] ([[User talk:Denispir|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 20:00, 30 August 2011 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Actually, I'd say that the content wasn't too bad. Trigger is the definitive source on archaeological theory. The bigger problem is that Wikipedia's archaeology coverage seems to be massively based on this outdated approach! [[User:PatHadley|PatHadley]] ([[User talk:PatHadley|talk]]) 21:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Merging in content from [[Archaeological culture]] == |
|||
See comment on [[Archaeological culture]] [[User:PatHadley|PatHadley]] ([[User talk:PatHadley|talk]]) 22:40, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 08:06, 31 January 2024
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Single Source
[edit]The article is based on a single source (Trigger 2007), referenced 11 times. This is rather problematic for an article about a potentially polemic subject, isn't it? Denispir (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:00, 30 August 2011 (UTC).
- Actually, I'd say that the content wasn't too bad. Trigger is the definitive source on archaeological theory. The bigger problem is that Wikipedia's archaeology coverage seems to be massively based on this outdated approach! PatHadley (talk) 21:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Merging in content from Archaeological culture
[edit]See comment on Archaeological culture PatHadley (talk) 22:40, 2 October 2011 (UTC)