Jump to content

Talk:Disjoint union (topology): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Added comment
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{Maths rating}}. Remove 2 deprecated parameters: field, historical.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{maths rating
{{WikiProject Mathematics| importance = low}}
| field = topology
| importance = low
| class = start
| historical =
}}
}}
== Canonical injection ==
== Canonical injection ==
Given <math>\varphi_i : X_i \to X\,</math>, the image of a point x cannot be a pair (x,i) as the latter is not an element of <math>X</math>. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/199.7.157.48|199.7.157.48]] ([[User talk:199.7.157.48|talk]]) 08:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The image of a point x cannot be a pair (x,i) as the latter is not an element of X.


== direct sum? ==
== direct sum? ==

Latest revision as of 22:33, 31 January 2024

Canonical injection

[edit]

Given , the image of a point x cannot be a pair (x,i) as the latter is not an element of . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.7.157.48 (talk) 08:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

direct sum?

[edit]

I thought "direct sum" implies product topology, and not the disjoint union. - Subh83 (talk | contribs) 22:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]