Jump to content

Talk:Doctor Arkeville: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{oldafdfull| date = 2 September 2010 (UTC) | result = '''merge to [[List of The Transformers characters]]''' | page = Doctor Arkeville }}
{{oldafdfull| date = 2 September 2010 (UTC) | result = '''merge to [[List of The Transformers characters]]''' | page = Doctor Arkeville }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Transformers|class=<!-- Formerly assessed as redirect-class -->}}
{{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=<!-- Formerly assessed as redirect-class -->}}
}}


{{WikiProject Transformers}}


== Name ==
== Name ==

Latest revision as of 23:45, 31 January 2024


Name

[edit]
  • Why is "Archeville" classed as incorrect? It seems a better fit -- it 'looks' more like a fictional German Mad Scientist's name, what with the ARCH EVIL ("chief/principal evil") in there. "Archeville" is also the spelling listed on IMDB under Casey Kasem's bio, and is that one that's far more widely used (if Google stats are any indication). Also, what about the spelling "Arkavil," which I've also seen commonly used (for example, on all the Binaltech boxes)? Dr Archeville 17:05, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Very late reply, but - It's incorrect because the scripts of the episodes spell it "Arkeville," therefore that's the right spelling. - Chris McFeely March 28th 2006
Citation/proof? Dr Archeville 21:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hypno-Chip as Article

[edit]

Hypno-Chip can't be it's own article, but Energo sword and Wash'n'Roll can? Dr Archeville 19:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ArchevilleProfile2.jpg

[edit]

Image:ArchevilleProfile2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]