Jump to content

Talk:Humfrey Gale: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with '{{WPMILHIST|class=B|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Biography=y|British=y|WWII=y|WWI=y}} Was his promotion to Lieutenant General in 44 only brevet? Otherwise why the hono...'
 
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArticleHistory|action1=GAN
{{WPMILHIST|class=B|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Biography=y|British=y|WWII=y|WWI=y}}
|action1date=00:05, 11 September 2010
|action1link=Talk:Humfrey Gale/GA1
|action1result=listed
|action1oldid=384006275
|currentstatus=GA
|topic=war
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|blp=n|listas=Gale, Humfrey|
{{WikiProject Biography|military-work-group=y|military-priority=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=GA|Biography=y|British=y|WWI=y|WWII=y|Cold-War=y}}
}}


== Untitled ==
Was his promotion to Lieutenant General in 44 only brevet? Otherwise why the honorary promotion in 1947?--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 18:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Was his promotion to Lieutenant General in 44 only brevet? Otherwise why the honorary promotion in 1947?--[[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]) 18:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
* Yes. Added this to the text. [[User:Hawkeye7|Hawkeye7]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|talk]]) 20:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

{{Talk:Humfrey Gale/GA1}}

Latest revision as of 06:55, 1 February 2024

Good articleHumfrey Gale has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 11, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Untitled

[edit]

Was his promotion to Lieutenant General in 44 only brevet? Otherwise why the honorary promotion in 1947?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Humfrey Gale/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]

3A Is there any way of finding out what the MC was awarded for ?--Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not that I know of. The London Gazette records only the award. I checked the WO medal card but it contains no further information. His full personnel file is unavailable, as he served in WWII. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]