Talk:Rubiales: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Requested move 29 August 2023: weak support |
Tag: |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Articles for creation |
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
||
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|ts=20230829074119|reviewer=Dan arndt|oldid=1172762708}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Disambiguation |
{{WikiProject Disambiguation}} |
||
}} |
|||
== Requested move 29 August 2023 == |
== Requested move 29 August 2023 == |
||
<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top --> |
|||
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.'' |
|||
The result of the move request was: '''Moved'''. Consensus below that this is a [[WP:NOPRIMARY]] situation.{{RMpmc}} [[User:Estar8806|estar8806]] ([[User talk:Estar8806|talk]]) [[Special:Contributions/Estar8806 |★]] 21:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
{{requested move/dated|multiple=yes |
|||
---- |
|||
|current1=Rubiales (disambiguation)|new1=Rubiales|current2=Rubiales|new2=Rubiales (plant)|}} |
|||
* [[:Rubiales (disambiguation)]] → {{no redirect|Rubiales}} |
* [[:Rubiales (disambiguation)]] → {{no redirect|Rubiales}} |
||
| Line 12: | Line 16: | ||
*'''Oppose''' per [[WP:PTM]] and [[WP:RECENTISM]]. I don't think people are on a single name basis with the soccer guy right now, if ever. The only things being disambiguated are the plant and the place, and the plant is much more popular. [[User:Zxcvbnm|ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ]] ([[User talk:Zxcvbnm|ᴛ]]) 10:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' per [[WP:PTM]] and [[WP:RECENTISM]]. I don't think people are on a single name basis with the soccer guy right now, if ever. The only things being disambiguated are the plant and the place, and the plant is much more popular. [[User:Zxcvbnm|ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ]] ([[User talk:Zxcvbnm|ᴛ]]) 10:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Weak support''' the plant has 1,764 views and the place has 84 but Luis Rubiales has 422,488[[https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=latest-20&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubiales_(disambiguation)]] though Luis is a PTM it seems given the views a DAB would be the best choice. '''[[User:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Green">Crouch, Swale</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Blue">talk</span>]]) 16:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC) |
*'''Weak support''' the plant has 1,764 views and the place has 84 but Luis Rubiales has 422,488[[https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=latest-20&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubiales_(disambiguation)]] though Luis is a PTM it seems given the views a DAB would be the best choice. '''[[User:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Green">Crouch, Swale</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Blue">talk</span>]]) 16:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' per nomination and Crouch, Swale. There are six entries listed upon the [[Rubiales (disambiguation)]] page, with no indication that the two-sentence stub delineating the plant has the standing to claim primacy over the combined notability of the remaining five entries. —[[User:Roman Spinner|'''Roman Spinner''']] <small>[[User talk:Roman Spinner|(talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Roman Spinner|contribs)]]</small> 01:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' per nom and those above. There are enough topics of sufficient significance to say that none is primary. [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:gold">'''''BD2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 00:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] --> |
|||
</div><div style="clear:both;"></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:52, 1 February 2024
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 29 August 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Consensus below that this is a WP:NOPRIMARY situation.(closed by non-admin page mover) estar8806 (talk) ★ 21:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
– no primary topic, there's a plant, a village, a place; that are stubs; and a surname (people listed on this page). 65.92.244.99 (talk) 09:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC) --
- Oppose per WP:PTM and WP:RECENTISM. I don't think people are on a single name basis with the soccer guy right now, if ever. The only things being disambiguated are the plant and the place, and the plant is much more popular. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support the plant has 1,764 views and the place has 84 but Luis Rubiales has 422,488[[1]] though Luis is a PTM it seems given the views a DAB would be the best choice. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and Crouch, Swale. There are six entries listed upon the Rubiales (disambiguation) page, with no indication that the two-sentence stub delineating the plant has the standing to claim primacy over the combined notability of the remaining five entries. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom and those above. There are enough topics of sufficient significance to say that none is primary. BD2412 T 00:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.