Talk:History of ITV television idents: Difference between revisions
FairuseBot (talk | contribs) File File:Lw79.png in this article is not compliant with the non-free content rules |
Tag: |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{oldafdfull|date= 17 December 2006 |result= '''keep and cleanup''' |votepage= ITV Idents and Presentation}} |
{{oldafdfull|date= 17 December 2006 |result= '''keep and cleanup''' |votepage= ITV Idents and Presentation}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|||
{{WikiProject Television|importance=Low|british-television=yes|british-television-importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Screenshots== |
==Screenshots== |
||
What has happened to this page's screenshots? [[User:Trixovator|Trixovator]] 10:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC) |
What has happened to this page's screenshots? [[User:Trixovator|Trixovator]] 10:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
Line 91: | Line 95: | ||
The following images also have this problem: |
The following images also have this problem: |
||
<!-- Additional 10c images go here --> |
<!-- Additional 10c images go here --> |
||
*[[:File:Centraltv-90logo.jpg]] |
|||
*[[:File:Westward Logo.jpg]] |
|||
*[[:File:Lw79.png]] |
*[[:File:Lw79.png]] |
||
*[[:Image:Itv2logo1999.jpg]] |
*[[:Image:Itv2logo1999.jpg]] |
||
Line 99: | Line 105: | ||
This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. --22:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC) |
This is an automated notice by [[User:FairuseBot|FairuseBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. --22:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Intricate detail == |
|||
To be quite honest the lists of specific idents used on the 2006 plus looks is too far. Someone might get away with it if there were only a few but there are so many that it's just messy and is not in Wikipedia's tone. [[User:Rafmarham|Rafmarham]] ([[User talk:Rafmarham|talk]]) 22:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Also there are too many (for the want of a kinder expression) 'ident geeks' using this page to indulge their interest and express personal opinions; for example describing a set of LWT idents as 'their worst idents ever'. [[User:Smurfmeister|Smurfmeister]] ([[User talk:Smurfmeister|talk]]) 18:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Protected == |
|||
Due to the extensive vandalism/edit warring that's taken place on this article since last September, I've protected it for 6 months against edits by non-autoconfirmed users (mainly IPs). Apologies to any good-faith IP editors here: for the time being you'll have to submit your requested changes on this page and wait for another editor to make them for you. Make sure you include references to [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]]! |
|||
There's a huge quantity of uncited information in this article - it would be good if editors with an interest in this topic could take this opportunity to clean it up. I cannot check how many of these idents are valid or accurately described because there are no references for me to go and check. [[WP:V|Our verifiability policy]] says that if there is no publicly-available reliable source we cannot include the information, so it may be that a lot of the content here should be removed. Comments? —[[User:Smalljim|S<small>MALL</small>]][[User talk:Smalljim#top|<small>JIM</small>]] 13:22, 3 March 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion == |
|||
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: |
|||
* [[commons:File:ITV1 Logo 2022.svg|ITV1 Logo 2022.svg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: speedy | 2022-11-19T14:21:35.194091 | ITV1 Logo 2022.svg --> |
|||
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 14:21, 19 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion == |
|||
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion: |
|||
* [[commons:File:ITV2 logo (2022).svg|ITV2 logo (2022).svg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2022-12-12T01:37:18.443340 | ITV2 logo (2022).svg --> |
|||
* [[commons:File:ITV3 logo (2022).svg|ITV3 logo (2022).svg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2022-12-12T01:37:18.443340 | ITV3 logo (2022).svg --> |
|||
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tvchannellogos81175012131|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 01:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:41, 2 February 2024
This article was nominated for deletion on 3 November 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 17 December 2006. The result of the discussion was keep and cleanup. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Screenshots
[edit]What has happened to this page's screenshots? Trixovator 10:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- They were removed as part of a articles for deletion decision, because the large number of images violate Wikipedia's fair use policy. Essentially, we should use as few fair use images as we can to illustrate the text to keep within the US laws Wikipedia needs to abide by. See here for more information: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITV Idents and Presentation. --tgheretford (talk) 11:13, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- The page still reads as captions - shouldn't it be cleaned up? Trixovator 20:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, it's been cleaned up. My mistake. Trixovator 20:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- The page still reads as captions - shouldn't it be cleaned up? Trixovator 20:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
ITV2
[edit]ITV2 has had five logos, not two! The first one (1998-2001) was a purple two above the ITV logo. Then there was one identical to ITV1's, with the yellow box with a 2 instead of a 1 in it. That was changed to a bevelled version, but was shortlived because the inverted logo was introduced. That was replaced with the current green logo. Digifiend
Fair use rationale for Image:ITV1logo06.gif
[edit]Image:ITV1logo06.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Launch-ITV3-Ident-Part4.jpg
[edit]Image:Launch-ITV3-Ident-Part4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:ITV2-Ident.jpg
[edit]Image:ITV2-Ident.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Itv-promo-boxes.jpg
[edit]Image:Itv-promo-boxes.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Itv1-3d.jpg
[edit]Image:Itv1-3d.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Itv1-October 1999–October 2002.gif
[edit]Image:Itv1-October 1999–October 2002.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Itv1-jan06.png
[edit]Image:Itv1-jan06.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:ITV2 logo.png
[edit]The image Image:ITV2 logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
- File:Centraltv-90logo.jpg
- File:Westward Logo.jpg
- File:Lw79.png
- Image:Itv2logo1999.jpg
- Image:ITV4.svg
- Image:ITV3.svg
- Image:ITV3-ident.jpg
- Image:ITV2.svg
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Intricate detail
[edit]To be quite honest the lists of specific idents used on the 2006 plus looks is too far. Someone might get away with it if there were only a few but there are so many that it's just messy and is not in Wikipedia's tone. Rafmarham (talk) 22:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Also there are too many (for the want of a kinder expression) 'ident geeks' using this page to indulge their interest and express personal opinions; for example describing a set of LWT idents as 'their worst idents ever'. Smurfmeister (talk) 18:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Protected
[edit]Due to the extensive vandalism/edit warring that's taken place on this article since last September, I've protected it for 6 months against edits by non-autoconfirmed users (mainly IPs). Apologies to any good-faith IP editors here: for the time being you'll have to submit your requested changes on this page and wait for another editor to make them for you. Make sure you include references to reliable sources!
There's a huge quantity of uncited information in this article - it would be good if editors with an interest in this topic could take this opportunity to clean it up. I cannot check how many of these idents are valid or accurately described because there are no references for me to go and check. Our verifiability policy says that if there is no publicly-available reliable source we cannot include the information, so it may be that a lot of the content here should be removed. Comments? —SMALLJIM 13:22, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:21, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)