Jump to content

Talk:Thomas–Fermi model: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment: Chemistry: class=Start, importance=Low (assisted)
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Physics |importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Chemistry |importance=Low}}
}}
== Hartree-Fock ==
The Thomas–Fermi–Dirac–Weizsäcker is not equivalent to Hartree-Fock. It is perhaps similar in spirit. Why all the Björn Roos talk? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.167.188.195|81.167.188.195]] ([[User talk:81.167.188.195|talk]]) 06:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The Thomas–Fermi–Dirac–Weizsäcker is not equivalent to Hartree-Fock. It is perhaps similar in spirit. Why all the Björn Roos talk? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.167.188.195|81.167.188.195]] ([[User talk:81.167.188.195|talk]]) 06:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: No mention of similar or HF in the article. No mention of Björn Roos. This seems done. {{done}}

{{WikiProject Physics |class=start |importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Chemistry |class=Start |importance=Low}}

Latest revision as of 07:44, 2 February 2024

Hartree-Fock

[edit]

The Thomas–Fermi–Dirac–Weizsäcker is not equivalent to Hartree-Fock. It is perhaps similar in spirit. Why all the Björn Roos talk? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.167.188.195 (talk) 06:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of similar or HF in the article. No mention of Björn Roos. This seems done.  Done