Talk:Thomas–Fermi model: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Christian75 (talk | contribs) Assessment: Chemistry: class=Start, importance=Low (assisted) |
Tag: |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Chemistry |importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== Hartree-Fock == |
|||
The Thomas–Fermi–Dirac–Weizsäcker is not equivalent to Hartree-Fock. It is perhaps similar in spirit. Why all the Björn Roos talk? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.167.188.195|81.167.188.195]] ([[User talk:81.167.188.195|talk]]) 06:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
The Thomas–Fermi–Dirac–Weizsäcker is not equivalent to Hartree-Fock. It is perhaps similar in spirit. Why all the Björn Roos talk? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.167.188.195|81.167.188.195]] ([[User talk:81.167.188.195|talk]]) 06:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
: No mention of similar or HF in the article. No mention of Björn Roos. This seems done. {{done}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ |
Latest revision as of 07:44, 2 February 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hartree-Fock
[edit]The Thomas–Fermi–Dirac–Weizsäcker is not equivalent to Hartree-Fock. It is perhaps similar in spirit. Why all the Björn Roos talk? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.167.188.195 (talk) 06:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- No mention of similar or HF in the article. No mention of Björn Roos. This seems done. Done