Talk:Kilocore: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 15:30, 4 February 2024

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

This is quite interesting I hope it will be available for consumer products.--74.36.255.119 14:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This could be a solution for high performance gaming and video editing processing

Unfortunately it will be a long waiting game.--Existential Thinker 14:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article now claims the KC256 started shipping in 2006.

So no more waiting for that.

What else can we say about consumer products, or the other chips, without crossing WP:NOT#CRYSTALBALL ? --76.209.28.72 13:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chip count

The article isn't clear as to whether this is 1024 or 1025 cores on a single chip, or if multiple closely-coupled chips are required. MarkMLl (talk) 11:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead?

I did some research on the kilocore. Rapport Inc.'s website is offline, they have been removed from power.org and even IBM is not very communicative about the cooperation and the technology. I think, they went bankrupt.. Wallento (talk) 13:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Rapport and kilocore quietly disappeared. Could find no source beyond 2006/2007. See http://www.ibm.com/Search/?sn=23&q=kilocore&v=16&us=utf&lang=en&cc=us&Search=Search Superp (talk) 20:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There has been some news recently… seems like ibm is still working on something like that, but Rapport wasn't mentioned. http://gizmodo.com/new-kilocore-chip-is-the-worlds-first-with-1-000-proc-1782305737 82.135.103.93 (talk) 13:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{WikiProject Computing|class=Stub|importance=|hardware=yes|auto=yes}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|
+{{WikiProject Computing|importance=|hardware=yes|auto=yes}}
+}}
 This is quite interesting I hope it will be available for consumer products.--[[User:74.36.255.119|74.36.255.119]] 14:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
@@ Line 18: / Line 20: @@
 :Looks like Rapport and kilocore quietly disappeared. Could find no source beyond 2006/2007. See http://www.ibm.com/Search/?sn=23&q=kilocore&v=16&us=utf&lang=en&cc=us&Search=Search [[User:Superp|Superp]] ([[User talk:Superp|talk]]) 20:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
-:There has been some news recently… seems like ibm is still working on something like that, but Rapport wasn't mentioned. http://gizmodo.com/new-kilocore-chip-is-the-worlds-first-with-1-000-proc-1782305737
+:There has been some news recently… seems like ibm is still working on something like that, but Rapport wasn't mentioned. http://gizmodo.com/new-kilocore-chip-is-the-worlds-first-with-1-000-proc-1782305737 [[Special:Contributions/82.135.103.93|82.135.103.93]] ([[User talk:82.135.103.93|talk]]) 13:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)