Talk:Robert Shimer: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with '{{WikiProject Economics}}' |
Tag: |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|blp=yes|listas=Shimer, Robert| |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography|auto=yes |
|||
}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Economics}} |
{{WikiProject Economics}} |
||
}} |
|||
==No secondary sources are cited== |
|||
The only references are this man's web site and articles he wrote. |
|||
There are no independent sources referred to in the article. |
|||
The guideline page -- [[WP:Notability]] -- states: |
|||
{{nutshell|A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable]] [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources|secondary sources]] that are [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent]] of the subject.|Notability criteria also must be met for a person to be included in a list or general article; in this case, however, the criteria are less stringent.|All biographies of living individuals '''must''' comply with the policy on [[WP:BLP|biographies of living individuals]], being supported by sufficient [[WP:RS|reliable independent sources]] to ensure [[WP:NPOV|neutrality]].}} |
|||
{{Notabilityguide}} |
|||
:I just linked to the Faculty list at the University of Chicago, and the Editorial Board list at the ''Journal of Political Economy'', as secondary sources to verify his positions. But hold on a minute... Shimer's articles and publications are not just blog posts. They are ''peer reviewed'' publications of the highest quality. His most famous paper (the one I cited) is published in ''American Economic Review'', usually considered the most prestigious economics journal. He is a member of one of the top five (roughly) economics departments, he edits one of the top five (roughly) economics journals, and he was invited to summarize his research contributions for the NBER (not everyone gets that opportunity), and his new book is published by one of the top publishers of academic work in economics. These are all signs of his notability within the economics field. His notability is typical for economists who are listed in Wikipedia (see [[List of economists]]). However, unlike many on the [[List of economists]], he is young, and his impact on economic research is being felt ''now''. I've now found another paper, by G. Cardullo, that discusses the impact of Shimer's work. But the conundrum of covering a currently-important researcher like Shimer is that most of the writing that proves his influence is ''by'' him, not yet ''about'' him. [[User:Rinconsoleao|Rinconsoleao]] ([[User talk:Rinconsoleao|talk]]) 09:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:38, 4 February 2024
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
No secondary sources are cited
[edit]The only references are this man's web site and articles he wrote.
There are no independent sources referred to in the article.
The guideline page -- WP:Notability -- states:
This page in a nutshell:
|
- I just linked to the Faculty list at the University of Chicago, and the Editorial Board list at the Journal of Political Economy, as secondary sources to verify his positions. But hold on a minute... Shimer's articles and publications are not just blog posts. They are peer reviewed publications of the highest quality. His most famous paper (the one I cited) is published in American Economic Review, usually considered the most prestigious economics journal. He is a member of one of the top five (roughly) economics departments, he edits one of the top five (roughly) economics journals, and he was invited to summarize his research contributions for the NBER (not everyone gets that opportunity), and his new book is published by one of the top publishers of academic work in economics. These are all signs of his notability within the economics field. His notability is typical for economists who are listed in Wikipedia (see List of economists). However, unlike many on the List of economists, he is young, and his impact on economic research is being felt now. I've now found another paper, by G. Cardullo, that discusses the impact of Shimer's work. But the conundrum of covering a currently-important researcher like Shimer is that most of the writing that proves his influence is by him, not yet about him. Rinconsoleao (talk) 09:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)