Jump to content

Talk:Maryland Route 284: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
C-class for Maryland WP
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArticleHistory
{{WikiProject Maryland|class=C}}
|action1=GAN
|action1date=15:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
|action1result=not listed
|action1oldid=295304157
|currentstatus=FGAN
|topic=transport
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject U.S. Roads|state=MD|importance=|class=redirect}}
}}


==Failed GA==
{{U.S. Roads WikiProject|state=MD|importance=Mid|class=C|needs-map=no}}
I'm sorry this took so long. I had a look at the article, compared it with other similar offerings, and decided to fail it on GA criterion 3)Broad in coverage. I took advice on this, I don't like failing articles (usually I tend to do so on a lack of referencing, or progress). The article is very small, and while there are no rules that set a minimum size for GA I would at least have expected to see some detail on what existed before the road was built, why it was built, what material it was/is made from, what traffic uses it, etc. You are of course free to re-nominate, but I would guess the reason its been up for nomination for so long is its lack of coverage of the subject. [[User:Parrot of Doom|Parrot of Doom]] ([[User talk:Parrot of Doom|talk]]) 15:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
:In addition, this route is probably too short and unnotable to have its own article. It would better fit in [[List of minor Maryland state highways]]. [[User:Dough4872|Dough4872]] ([[User talk:Dough4872|talk]]) 23:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:10, 4 February 2024

Former good article nomineeMaryland Route 284 was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 24, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed

Failed GA

[edit]

I'm sorry this took so long. I had a look at the article, compared it with other similar offerings, and decided to fail it on GA criterion 3)Broad in coverage. I took advice on this, I don't like failing articles (usually I tend to do so on a lack of referencing, or progress). The article is very small, and while there are no rules that set a minimum size for GA I would at least have expected to see some detail on what existed before the road was built, why it was built, what material it was/is made from, what traffic uses it, etc. You are of course free to re-nominate, but I would guess the reason its been up for nomination for so long is its lack of coverage of the subject. Parrot of Doom (talk) 15:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, this route is probably too short and unnotable to have its own article. It would better fit in List of minor Maryland state highways. Dough4872 (talk) 23:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]