Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tech Bureau: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Tech Bureau.
 
Tech Bureau: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Tech Bureau]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 00:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
===[[:Tech Bureau]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Tech Bureau}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tech Bureau|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 26#{{anchorencode:Tech Bureau}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1159548894/cur|edits since nomination]])
:{{la|1=Tech Bureau}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tech Bureau|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 February 2#{{anchorencode:Tech Bureau}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1159548894/cur|edits since nomination]])
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Tech Bureau}})
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Tech Bureau}})
Not meeting WPNCORP, only 3 sources with routine coverage of stolen money case. Not in-depth, not reliable independent. [[User:Ne (00) olli|Ne (00) olli]] ([[User talk:Ne (00) olli|talk]]) 13:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
<s>Not meeting WPNCORP, only 3 sources with routine coverage of stolen money case. Not in-depth, not reliable independent. [[User:Ne (00) olli|Ne (00) olli]] ([[User talk:Ne (00) olli|talk]]) 13:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)</s> {{small|[[WP:SOCKSTRIKE]]. [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 14:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)}}
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|Companies]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Japan|Japan]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 14:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Cryptocurrency|Cryptocurrency]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|Internet]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|Software]]. '''[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">WC</span>''<span style="color:#999933">Quidditch</span>'']]''' [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style="color:#999933">✎</span>]] 18:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)</small>
:'''Delete''' one-event-based company. Unfortunately no NCORP and no RS. --[[User:BoraVoro|BoraVoro]] ([[User talk:BoraVoro|talk]]) 07:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 14:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p>
*'''Weak keep''' The three sources used in the article are all RS. I also found coverage from outside Japan, [https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/crytocurrency-hackers-japan-1.4831380], [https://www.newindianexpress.com/world/2018/Sep/20/usd-60-million-stolen-in-crypto-attack-in-japan-1874681.html] and elsewhere in Asia [https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Cryptocurrencies/Japanese-cryptocurrency-exchange-Zaif-hacked-for-60m2], showing a more global view of the company. All articles are about the theft, but I think we have enough to build an article. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 15:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' all the sources mentioned don't meet Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Independent_sources especially when applying WP:SIRS guideline. [[Special:Contributions/2A01:E0A:375:3810:B82B:91C2:DC5C:A05F|2A01:E0A:375:3810:B82B:91C2:DC5C:A05F]] ([[User talk:2A01:E0A:375:3810:B82B:91C2:DC5C:A05F|talk]]) 16:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' None of the sources meet our GNG/[[WP:NCORP]] criteria for establishing notability. [[User:HighKing|<b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:HighKing|<span style="font-family: Courier; color: #da0000;">++ </span>]]</sup> 13:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 00:43, 5 February 2024

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 00:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech Bureau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meeting WPNCORP, only 3 sources with routine coverage of stolen money case. Not in-depth, not reliable independent. Ne (00) olli (talk) 13:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. plicit 14:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one-event-based company. Unfortunately no NCORP and no RS. --BoraVoro (talk) 07:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.