Jump to content

Talk:Grimace Shake/GA2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with '==GA Review== {{Good article tools}} {{subst:GAN/subst|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} '''Reviewer:''' [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|contribs]]) ~~~~~ <!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) be...'
 
close and archive
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:


<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
{{Archive top
|status =
|result = Review voided and nomination placed back in the queue — [[User:Bilorv|Bilorv]] ('''[[User talk:Bilorv|<span style="color:purple">talk</span>]]''') 21:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
}}
[[WP:QUICKFAIL]], Still a start class, issues from [[Talk:Grimace Shake/GA1|previous GA nomination]] slightly addressed. maybe could get reassessed as C, but a long shot from a good article. Most effort is still on the reception and controversy, but the lead is better and more balanced, it still needs expansion (as well as the rest of the page).<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Begocc|Begocc]] ([[User talk:Begocc#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Begocc|contribs]]) 11:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)</small>
:{{ping|Begocc}} May I close this nomination for you? [[User:TrademarkedTWOrantula|<span style="color: darkgreen"><span style="font-family: Georgia">TWOrantula</span></span>]]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>([[User talk:TrademarkedTWOrantula|enter the web]])</small> 18:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
::{{Ping|TrademarkedTWOrantula}} see [[User talk:Begocc#Grimace Shake quickfail]]. {{Ping|Begocc|Arconning}} would you be happy for this review to be voided and for the article to placed back in the Good Article Nominations queue (with its old timestamp) for somebody else to review? — [[User:Bilorv|Bilorv]] ('''[[User talk:Bilorv|<span style="color:purple">talk</span>]]''') 17:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Did not see that. Whoops. [[User:TrademarkedTWOrantula|<span style="color: darkgreen"><span style="font-family: Georgia">TWOrantula</span></span>]]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>([[User talk:TrademarkedTWOrantula|enter the web]])</small> 22:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Yea, just void this review. it was pretty bad anyway :/ [[User:Begocc|Begocci]] ([[User talk:Begocc|talk]]) 15:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
{{Archive bottom}}

Latest revision as of 21:59, 5 February 2024

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Begocc (talk · contribs) 11:22, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


WP:QUICKFAIL, Still a start class, issues from previous GA nomination slightly addressed. maybe could get reassessed as C, but a long shot from a good article. Most effort is still on the reception and controversy, but the lead is better and more balanced, it still needs expansion (as well as the rest of the page).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Begocc (talkcontribs) 11:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Begocc: May I close this nomination for you? TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 18:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TrademarkedTWOrantula: see User talk:Begocc#Grimace Shake quickfail. @Begocc and Arconning: would you be happy for this review to be voided and for the article to placed back in the Good Article Nominations queue (with its old timestamp) for somebody else to review? — Bilorv (talk) 17:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did not see that. Whoops. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 22:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, just void this review. it was pretty bad anyway :/ Begocci (talk) 15:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.