Talk:Mińsk Mazowiecki: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
WPP B-Class Review |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Poland}}. Remove 6 deprecated parameters: b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6. Tag: |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
||
⚫ | |||
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = no |
|||
}} |
|||
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = no |
|||
| b3 <!--Structure --> = no |
|||
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = no |
|||
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = no |
|||
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = no |
|||
⚫ | |||
== B-Class Review == |
== B-Class Review == |
||
It is a series of unreferenced lists. I would suggest looking at Krakow or Bialystok or Warsaw for a good example of B-Class. [[User:Ajh1492|Ajh1492]] ([[User talk:Ajh1492|talk]]) 16:53, 18 April 2011 (UTC) |
It is a series of unreferenced lists. I would suggest looking at Krakow or Bialystok or Warsaw for a good example of B-Class. [[User:Ajh1492|Ajh1492]] ([[User talk:Ajh1492|talk]]) 16:53, 18 April 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:57, 6 February 2024
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
B-Class Review
[edit]It is a series of unreferenced lists. I would suggest looking at Krakow or Bialystok or Warsaw for a good example of B-Class. Ajh1492 (talk) 16:53, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
it is not >stub<, it is like "Mińsk Mazowiecki" in polish wikipedia ;) I am