Talk:University of Zaragoza: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 12:21, 6 February 2024

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

Spain

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on University of Zaragoza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History of the old Studium

I completed the history of the Studium, specially the beginning of the XVI century. There are basically 6 sources for it, and most of them just with tangential information, small book chapters and short papers written by scholars San Vicente Pino, Pedraza, Pallares, Blasco, Abizanda Broto, and the book about Histoy of the University of Zaragoza, coordinated by Rujula and Lomba, (2016, but they did not use the documents of Abizanda nor those of Pedraza, nor it has the depth of explaining the mechanism, teachers, building, lessons or progression in studies), all together they gathered like 50 documents from the end of XV and beginnings of the XVI century. What Gonzalez Ancín & Towns (2017) did is to use them all, and add 70 more documents they found, and that allowed them to study these mechanisms in detail, well beyond any other scholar before. This means the information from 1477-1530/1540 is well covered. What remains to be completed is what happened after. During the next days I will try complete it with all the other sources, mostly San Vicente Pino & the book from 2016, they provide substantial detail on those later periods of time. It also seems there is no plagiarism anymore in the article, taken from a website, as a user noticed- RaymondLeffere — Preceding unsigned comment added by RaymondLeffere (talk • contribs) 15:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
+{{WikiProject Higher education}}
 {{WikiProject Spain}}
+}}
 == External links modified ==
@@ Line 17: / Line 19: @@
 ==History of the old Studium==
-I completed the history of the Studium, specially the beginning of the  XVI century.  There are  basically  6 sources for it, and most of them just with tangential information, small book chapters and short papers written by scholars San Vicente Pino, Pedraza, Pallares, Blasco, Abizanda Broto, and the book about Histoy of the University of Zaragoza (2016, but they did not use the documents of Abizanda nor those of Pedraza, nor it has the depth of explaining the mechanism,  teachers, building, lessons or progression in studies), all together they gathered like 50 documents from the end of XV and  beginnings of the XVI century.  What Gonzalez Ancín & Towns (2017) did is to use them all, and add 70 more documents they found, and that  allows them to study in detail, well beyond any other scholar before. This means the information from 1477-1530/1540 is well covered.  What remains to be completed is what happened after. I will try complete it with all the other sources, mostly San Vicente Pino & the book from 2016, they provide substantial detail on those later periods of time.- RaymondLeffere
+I completed the history of the Studium, specially the beginning of the  XVI century.  There are  basically  6 sources for it, and most of them just with tangential information, small book chapters and short papers written by scholars San Vicente Pino, Pedraza, Pallares, Blasco, Abizanda Broto, and the book about ''Histoy of the University of Zaragoza'', coordinated by Rujula and Lomba,  (2016, but they did not use the documents of Abizanda nor those of Pedraza, nor it has the depth of explaining the mechanism,  teachers, building, lessons or progression in studies), all together they gathered like 50 documents from the end of XV and  beginnings of the XVI century.  What Gonzalez Ancín & Towns (2017) did is to use them all, and add 70 more documents they found, and that  allowed them to study these mechanisms in detail, well beyond any other scholar before. This means the information from 1477-1530/1540 is well covered.  What remains to be completed is what happened after. During the next days I will try complete it with all the other sources, mostly San Vicente Pino & the book from 2016, they provide substantial detail on those later periods of time. It also seems there is no  plagiarism anymore in the article, taken from  a website, as a user noticed- RaymondLeffere  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:RaymondLeffere|RaymondLeffere]] ([[User talk:RaymondLeffere#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/RaymondLeffere|contribs]]) 15:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->