Jump to content

Talk:Vile Parle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m RahulBodke moved page Talk:Vile Parle to Talk:Villeparle
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WP India
{{WikiProject India|importance=Low
|class=start
|importance=Low
|maharashtra=yes
|maharashtra=yes
|maharashtra-importance=low
|maharashtra-importance=low
Line 9: Line 8:
|image-needed=yes
|image-needed=yes
|assess-date=September 2008
|assess-date=September 2008
}}
}}
}}
Fairly good article, needs a little sprucing. [[User:Manasl|Manasl]] 06:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Fairly good article, needs a little sprucing. [[User:Manasl|Manasl]] 06:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:25, 7 February 2024

Fairly good article, needs a little sprucing. Manasl 06:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lists

[edit]

Hi guys, I am skeptical of including list of schools and colleges, malls, hospitals, places of worships... for that matter any kind of lists. Wiki is encyclopedia so things should be presented in details if they are worth knowing or is associated with any kind of important events in past or present. Information should not be bulleted.

Wikipedia is not a directory, and hey, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information either.


If you all agree I would like to delete all lists from this page. spacejuncky 15:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right -- listing all schools in a suburb is encyclopedic. I've included the names of institutions with their articles in See also section. This will avoid the possibility of these articles becoming orphaned. utcursch | talk 10:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there are collegaes like dahanukar and sathe Saumitra06 (talk) 12:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vile Parle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]