Talk:Out of the Blue (1980 film): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Film}}, {{WikiProject Canada}}. Tag: |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub| |
||
{{WikiProject Film|Canadian-task-force=yes}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Canada|importance=low|cinema=yes}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== Banning == |
== Banning == |
||
| Line 5: | Line 8: | ||
Why was it banned? [[User:Drutt|Drutt]] ([[User talk:Drutt|talk]]) 14:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC) |
Why was it banned? [[User:Drutt|Drutt]] ([[User talk:Drutt|talk]]) 14:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
: This line seems to have flummoxed people as far back as 2007; I've trimmed it down to the bare facts. It implied the film was banned in the UK and that there was a "legal" version of it, but according to the BBFC "''All known versions of this work passed uncut.''"[http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/out-blue-1980 1] |
: This line seems to have flummoxed people as far back as 2007; I've trimmed it down to the bare facts. It implied the film was banned in the UK and that there was a "legal" version of it, but according to the BBFC "''All known versions of this work passed uncut.''"[http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/out-blue-1980 1]. The certificate is dated 2001, and the lack of substantive information about a ban or cuts implies that it was simply not given a wide release rather than banned. It definitely appeared as part of Channel 4's series of banned films - but was it banned ''in the UK''? -[[User:Ashley Pomeroy|Ashley Pomeroy]] ([[User talk:Ashley Pomeroy|talk]]) 14:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
: In fact, after reading a bit more, it seems that Channel 4's red triangle series wasn't of ''banned'' films at all, just films that were potentially controversial. I recall the channel showing a series of a genuinely banned films some years later - it had ''[[Life of Brian]]'' (religion), ''[[W.R.: Mysteries of the Organism]]'' (cocks) - but that was a separate thing. In fact Wikipedia has an article on it [[Channel 4 Banned season|here]]. -[[User:Ashley Pomeroy|Ashley Pomeroy]] ([[User talk:Ashley Pomeroy|talk]]) 14:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Untitled == |
== Untitled == |
||
Latest revision as of 05:54, 7 February 2024
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Banning
[edit]Why was it banned? Drutt (talk) 14:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- This line seems to have flummoxed people as far back as 2007; I've trimmed it down to the bare facts. It implied the film was banned in the UK and that there was a "legal" version of it, but according to the BBFC "All known versions of this work passed uncut."1. The certificate is dated 2001, and the lack of substantive information about a ban or cuts implies that it was simply not given a wide release rather than banned. It definitely appeared as part of Channel 4's series of banned films - but was it banned in the UK? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- In fact, after reading a bit more, it seems that Channel 4's red triangle series wasn't of banned films at all, just films that were potentially controversial. I recall the channel showing a series of a genuinely banned films some years later - it had Life of Brian (religion), W.R.: Mysteries of the Organism (cocks) - but that was a separate thing. In fact Wikipedia has an article on it here. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 14:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]I saw it in London the year Lady Diana got married. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.82.115.193 (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)