Jump to content

Total relation: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
add some verbiage about strict versus weak orders
See also: suggest to establish connection the total rel.s
 
(76 intermediate revisions by 45 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Type of logical relation}}
In [[mathematics]], a [[binary relation]] ''R'' over a [[set]] ''X'' is '''total''' if it holds for all ''a'' and ''b'' in ''X'' that ''a'' is related to ''b'' or ''b'' is related to ''a'' (or both).
{{for|relations ''R'' where ''<nowiki>x=y</nowiki>'' or ''xRy'' or ''yRx'' for all ''x'' and ''y''|connected relation}}


In [[mathematics]], a [[binary relation]] ''R'' ⊆ ''X''×''Y'' between two sets ''X'' and ''Y'' is '''total''' (or '''left total''') if the source set ''X'' equals the domain {''x'' : there is a ''y'' with ''xRy'' }. Conversely, ''R'' is called '''right total''' if ''Y'' equals the range {''y'' : there is an ''x'' with ''xRy'' }.
In [[mathematical notation]], this is
:<math>\forall a, b \in X,\ a R b \or b R a.</math>


When ''f'': ''X'' → ''Y'' is a [[function (mathematics)|function]], the domain of ''f'' is all of ''X'', hence ''f'' is a total relation. On the other hand, if ''f'' is a [[partial function]], then the domain may be a proper subset of ''X'', in which case ''f'' is not a total relation.
For example, "is less than or equal to" is a total relation over the set of real numbers, because for two numbers either the first is less than equal than the second, or the second is less than or equal to the first. On the other hand, "is less than" is not a total relation, since one can pick two equal numbers, and then neither the first is less than the second, nor is the second less than the first (but note that "is less than" is a weak order which gives rise to a total order, namely "is less than or equal to". The relationship between strict orders and weak orders is discussed at [[partially ordered set]]). The relation "is a subset of" is also not total.


"A binary relation is said to be total with respect to a universe of discourse just in case everything in that universe of discourse stands in that relation to something else."<ref>[http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/projects/logicandproofs/alpha/htmltest/m15_functions/chapter15.html Functions] from [[Carnegie Mellon University]]</ref>
Total relations are sometimes said to have ''comparability''.


==Algebraic characterization==
A common total relation is the [[total order]].
Total relations can be characterized algebraically by equalities and inequalities involving [[composition of relations|compositions of relations]]. To this end, let <math>X,Y</math> be two sets, and let <math>R\subseteq X\times Y.</math> For any two sets <math>A,B,</math> let <math>L_{A,B}=A\times B</math> be the [[universal relation]] between <math>A</math> and <math>B,</math> and let <math>I_A=\{(a,a):a\in A\}</math> be the [[identity relation]] on <math>A.</math> We use the notation <math>R^\top</math> for the [[converse relation]] of <math>R.</math>


* <math>R</math> is total iff for any set <math>W</math> and any <math>S\subseteq W\times X,</math> <math>S\ne\emptyset</math> implies <math>SR\ne\emptyset.</math><ref name=R&G>{{cite book|last1=Schmidt|first1=Gunther|last2=Ströhlein|first2=Thomas|title=Relations and Graphs: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Scientists|url={{google books |plainurl=y |id=ZgarCAAAQBAJ|paged=54}}|date=6 December 2012|publisher=[[Springer Science & Business Media]]|isbn=978-3-642-77968-8|author-link1=Gunther Schmidt}}</ref>{{rp|54}}
[[Category:Set theory]]
* <math>R</math> is total iff <math>I_X\subseteq RR^\top.</math><ref name=R&G/>{{rp|54}}
* If <math>R</math> is total, then <math>L_{X,Y}=RL_{Y,Y}.</math> The converse is true if <math>Y\ne\emptyset.</math><ref group=note>If <math>Y=\emptyset\ne X,</math> then <math>R</math> will be not total.</ref>
* If <math>R</math> is total, then <math>\overline{RL_{Y,Y}}=\emptyset.</math> The converse is true if <math>Y\ne\emptyset.</math><ref group=note>Observe <math>\overline{RL_{Y,Y}}=\emptyset\Leftrightarrow RL_{Y,Y}=L_{X,Y},</math> and apply the previous bullet.</ref><ref name=R&G/>{{rp|63}}
* If <math>R</math> is total, then <math>\overline R\subseteq R\overline{I_Y}.</math> The converse is true if <math>Y\ne\emptyset.</math><ref name=R&G/>{{rp|54}}<ref name=GS11>{{cite book | doi=10.1017/CBO9780511778810 | isbn=9780511778810 | author=Gunther Schmidt | title=Relational Mathematics | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | year=2011 }} Definition 5.8, page 57.</ref>
* More generally, if <math>R</math> is total, then for any set <math>Z</math> and any <math>S\subseteq Y\times Z,</math> <math>\overline{RS}\subseteq R\overline S.</math> The converse is true if <math>Y\ne\emptyset.</math><ref group=note>Take <math>Z=Y,S=I_Y</math> and appeal to the previous bullet.</ref><ref name=R&G/>{{rp|57}}


==See also==
[[cs:Úplná relace]]
* [[Serial relation]] &mdash; a total homogeneous relation

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note}}

==References==
{{reflist}}

* [[Gunther Schmidt]] & Michael Winter (2018) ''Relational Topology''
* C. Brink, W. Kahl, and G. Schmidt (1997) ''Relational Methods in Computer Science'', Advances in Computer Science, page 5, {{ISBN|3-211-82971-7}}
* Gunther Schmidt & Thomas Strohlein (2012)[1987] {{Google books|ZgarCAAAQBAJ|Relations and Graphs|page=54}}
* Gunther Schmidt (2011) {{Google books|E4REBTs5WsC|Relational Mathematics|page=57}}

{{Order theory}}

[[Category:Properties of binary relations]]

Latest revision as of 15:30, 7 February 2024

In mathematics, a binary relation RX×Y between two sets X and Y is total (or left total) if the source set X equals the domain {x : there is a y with xRy }. Conversely, R is called right total if Y equals the range {y : there is an x with xRy }.

When f: XY is a function, the domain of f is all of X, hence f is a total relation. On the other hand, if f is a partial function, then the domain may be a proper subset of X, in which case f is not a total relation.

"A binary relation is said to be total with respect to a universe of discourse just in case everything in that universe of discourse stands in that relation to something else."[1]

Algebraic characterization

[edit]

Total relations can be characterized algebraically by equalities and inequalities involving compositions of relations. To this end, let be two sets, and let For any two sets let be the universal relation between and and let be the identity relation on We use the notation for the converse relation of

  • is total iff for any set and any implies [2]: 54 
  • is total iff [2]: 54 
  • If is total, then The converse is true if [note 1]
  • If is total, then The converse is true if [note 2][2]: 63 
  • If is total, then The converse is true if [2]: 54 [3]
  • More generally, if is total, then for any set and any The converse is true if [note 3][2]: 57 

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ If then will be not total.
  2. ^ Observe and apply the previous bullet.
  3. ^ Take and appeal to the previous bullet.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Functions from Carnegie Mellon University
  2. ^ a b c d e Schmidt, Gunther; Ströhlein, Thomas (6 December 2012). Relations and Graphs: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Scientists. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-642-77968-8.
  3. ^ Gunther Schmidt (2011). Relational Mathematics. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511778810. ISBN 9780511778810. Definition 5.8, page 57.