Talk:Pointwise product: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Adding class, importance & field to maths rating template |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{Maths rating}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: field. Tag: |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|||
{{Maths rating|class=start|importance=low|field=analysis}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Mathematics|importance=low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
Argh. How about having this in English? |
Argh. How about having this in English? |
||
: i don't see any obvious way to edit the article. There are plenty of blue links going to encyclopaedic descriptions of the prior knowledge you need. If you don't know what a function is, or you don't know that a function maps from a domain to a codomain, then it'll be difficult to understand the idea of a pointwise product of two functions. There is also an example with f(x) = 2x and g(x) = x + 1. It's difficult to get more introductory than that. |
: i don't see any obvious way to edit the article. There are plenty of blue links going to encyclopaedic descriptions of the prior knowledge you need. If you don't know what a function is, or you don't know that a function maps from a domain to a codomain, then it'll be difficult to understand the idea of a pointwise product of two functions. There is also an example with f(x) = 2x and g(x) = x + 1. It's difficult to get more introductory than that. |
||
Latest revision as of 01:49, 8 February 2024
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Argh. How about having this in English?
- i don't see any obvious way to edit the article. There are plenty of blue links going to encyclopaedic descriptions of the prior knowledge you need. If you don't know what a function is, or you don't know that a function maps from a domain to a codomain, then it'll be difficult to understand the idea of a pointwise product of two functions. There is also an example with f(x) = 2x and g(x) = x + 1. It's difficult to get more introductory than that.
- The article looks OK to me in it's present 09:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC) state. Maybe someone could add a reference, although mathematical Wikipedia articles tend to get consensus by their internal logic and by using standard terminology, IMHO. Boud (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- It's mysterious how such a simple concept became stretched out into this. If I didn't know better and read this article, I would have thought pointwise products were some high level complicated scholarly topic. 24.85.161.72 (talk) 06:53, 26 May 2013 (UTC)