Talk:Greg Brockman

Why notable?

• A wide variety of reliable sources directly cover Brockman directly (as cited in the draft; although, I would love to expand significantly over time, with the help of fellow editors!)
• Even more so recently, Brockman has become a major influence in the tech and AI fields.
• The past rejected drafts and deleted articles existed well before his more recent increase in notability, which largely occurred as a result of the popularity of OpenAI's large language models and it's chat bot, ChatGPT

Ajshul^<talk> 15:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Kindly asking to let this page to exist in the space Katyborsh (talk) 22:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

You can list the page on Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests to have an admin take a look and move the page to mainspace. I haven't reviewed whether the page definitely follows WP:GNG but check if there are sources that substantively cover Brockman himself. Enervation (talk) 05:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Deleted history

@Scope creep (and any interested editors), let me know if you'd like the history restored. This version is substantially better for myriad reasons,but as there were no CV/BLP violations, I'm happy to restore if folks think it will be helpful. Star Mississippi 18:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: I'm not sure to be honest. I would say yes, unless somebody objects for some reason. scope_creep^Talk 20:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

I wasn't aware of a good reason not to either, so I've done so. Happy editing all Star Mississippi 21:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Kara Swisher says she has a scoop

I am not a good enough Wikipedian to know off the cuff whether these tweets are noteworthy or sufficiently reliable in her voice for inclusion, but my longstanding impression is a lot of Silicon Valley goes to Kara Swisher when they want to leak, and her leak reporting is nearly flawless, unlike her op/eds. So I offer these excerpts for consideration by the more steeped in such questions: "it was a 'misalignment' of the profit versus nonprofit adherents at the company. The developer day was an issue.... Sources tell me that the profit direction of the company under Altman and the speed of development, which could be seen as too risky, and the nonprofit side dedicated to more safety and caution were at odds. One person on the Sam side called it a “coup,” while another said it was the the right move." Sandizer (talk) 03:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC)