Jump to content

Talk:Postcard: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Philately}}.
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|
{{Limitedgeographicscope}}
{{WikiProject Philately |importance=Mid}}
}}
{{archives|auto=short|search=yes}}


== Julian Mandel: Marionnette à fils image. ==
Info regarding the legal dimensions of a postcard would be helpful (see http://www.log-on.org/PC_Template.html)


This is one of the images of postcards in the Gallery section.
To the person that asked the above question: Since you have the link, why not use info from that link to add the info you wish to see on this wiki page? [[User:Postcard Cathy|Postcard Cathy]] 00:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)


The wikipedia entry for Mandel correctly states that "a majority of the French nude postcards were called postcards because of the size. They were never meant to be postally sent. It was illegal to send such images in the post".
== Erotic Postcard ==


But this article is about postcards that were "..... intended for writing and mailing without an envelope."
I really don't think it is necessary to have nudity on the postcard page. I'm totally against censorship whenever there is a reason to include objectionable material. However, this is just gratuitous and does not help wikipedia. If you search for "boob" you might expect to see breasts, but if you search for "postcard"....


Because the Marionnette a fils image is only called a "postcard" because of its size, and because it was not designed to be sent through the mail, it isnt relevant to this exact wikipedia article. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2600:1700:EA01:1090:CC4:CE8A:9F7C:BDAC|2600:1700:EA01:1090:CC4:CE8A:9F7C:BDAC]] ([[User talk:2600:1700:EA01:1090:CC4:CE8A:9F7C:BDAC#top|talk]]) 00:05, 26 March 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
So, I'm removing it. Let me know if anyone has an objection.


== Major update ==
Hi, I found it offensive as well, and I already removed.
bobsmith319.


Hi all,
==Merge with [[Advertising postcard]]==


I have made a large update to the article. I did not remove any content that was there previously. However, some of it was moved to new sections or rephrased and incorporated with citations. I also looked over the talk page to take concerns into consideration before making changes. Here is an overview of some of the changes made.
[[Postcard]] could certainly use the extra content, while on its own it is NN. <span style="background-color:#000000"><font color="white">(|--</font></span> <span style="background-color:#CCCCCC">[[User talk:Ultimus|<font color="red">'''UlT</font><font color="green">i</font><font color="blue">MuS'''</font>]]</span> 05:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
<br>
* '''Structure:''' The article's structure and arrangement were refined which will hopefully allow for more consistent additions going forward. This mainly consisted of creating separate sections for individual countries, which now have subsections for history, country-specific topics (such as British seaside postcards), and standards--in that order. "Controversies" was expanded by adding a subsection on "Legalities and censorship"--other controversial topics can be added in different subsections. The arrangement of the last few sections was changed slightly as it seemed to flow better this way (Historical overview > Countries > Controversies > Historical value > Collecting). The section on "Free postcards" was very small, and moved into the glossary under "Advertising cards." Only minor tweaks were made to the glossary to make it more consistent and to add a few citations (it still could use more).<br>
* '''Written Content:''' The total amount of content has roughly doubled. Much of the content previously was uncited, and there are still portions which remain uncited that I did not touch. However, the total number of citations has more than doubled from about 20 to 60. Content was added throughout, but especially for the "Historical overview" which I treated as an overview for all countries. Information which went "too far into the weeds" was moved to specific country sections, while still creating a detailed overview. Other sections were also expanded upon, such as the "United States", "Controversies", "Historical value", and "Collecting". Some country-specific sections could use more content, such as the non-existent "History" subsection for Russia (it only includes "Standards" currently). Other countries which are mentioned in the "Historical overview" like Austria and Germany, could also use sections.
* '''Images:''' No images were removed. The arrangement was changed, to better fit the new article layout. One caption for the back of a card was changed as it referred to a postcard front which was no longer on the page. I also added an image of "Lipman's Postal Card" and a field postal from the Franco-Prussian War (which are specifically mentioned in the body).
<br>
Thank you all, I hope everyone is receptive to this change. Absolutely willing to make modifications as you see fit.
[[User:UliBretzel|UliBretzel]] ([[User talk:UliBretzel|talk]]) 05:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)


== Commons:WikiProject Postcards ==
== Expand request ==


[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-22727-0011, Ochsensaal, Kreis Oschatz, Bauern im Gespräch (cropped).jpg|thumb|You like postcards, then this is the right project for you!]]
'seaside postcard' redirects here. a distinct subset of seaside postcards that is entirely missing is the ''saucy seaside postcard''. Can some kind soul write something up on this ? it might be a uniquely british phenomenon, but there should be something to find on google at least. thanks {{unsigned|Ordew}}
:There was a section here a while ago that was integrated from an article I wrote - I think a vandal must have removed it. I'll have a hunt around in the history. '''[[User:Bob Castle|Bob]]''' <small>'''[[User talk:Bob Castle|talk]]'''</small> 00:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Everyone who is interested in postcards is invited to join the [[:c:Commons:WikiProject Postcards|Commons:WikiProject Postcards]]. There, we have been trying to organize the huge mass of images on the topic in the Commons since March 2020. Best regards --[[User:Stefan Kühn|sk]] ([[User talk:Stefan Kühn|talk]]) 10:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
::Ah, yes, I've readded it - I think the page was vandalised and reverted to the wrong version.'''[[User:Bob Castle|Bob]]''' <small>'''[[User talk:Bob Castle|talk]]'''</small> 00:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

==Shaped Postcards==
Information on these should be expanded, and instance e.g. of Australia Post's Impact Mail included. --[[User:Daniel C. Boyer|Daniel C. Boyer]] 21:24, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:10, 8 February 2024

Julian Mandel: Marionnette à fils image.

[edit]

This is one of the images of postcards in the Gallery section.

The wikipedia entry for Mandel correctly states that "a majority of the French nude postcards were called postcards because of the size. They were never meant to be postally sent. It was illegal to send such images in the post".

But this article is about postcards that were "..... intended for writing and mailing without an envelope."

Because the Marionnette a fils image is only called a "postcard" because of its size, and because it was not designed to be sent through the mail, it isnt relevant to this exact wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:EA01:1090:CC4:CE8A:9F7C:BDAC (talk) 00:05, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Major update

[edit]

Hi all,

I have made a large update to the article. I did not remove any content that was there previously. However, some of it was moved to new sections or rephrased and incorporated with citations. I also looked over the talk page to take concerns into consideration before making changes. Here is an overview of some of the changes made.

  • Structure: The article's structure and arrangement were refined which will hopefully allow for more consistent additions going forward. This mainly consisted of creating separate sections for individual countries, which now have subsections for history, country-specific topics (such as British seaside postcards), and standards--in that order. "Controversies" was expanded by adding a subsection on "Legalities and censorship"--other controversial topics can be added in different subsections. The arrangement of the last few sections was changed slightly as it seemed to flow better this way (Historical overview > Countries > Controversies > Historical value > Collecting). The section on "Free postcards" was very small, and moved into the glossary under "Advertising cards." Only minor tweaks were made to the glossary to make it more consistent and to add a few citations (it still could use more).
  • Written Content: The total amount of content has roughly doubled. Much of the content previously was uncited, and there are still portions which remain uncited that I did not touch. However, the total number of citations has more than doubled from about 20 to 60. Content was added throughout, but especially for the "Historical overview" which I treated as an overview for all countries. Information which went "too far into the weeds" was moved to specific country sections, while still creating a detailed overview. Other sections were also expanded upon, such as the "United States", "Controversies", "Historical value", and "Collecting". Some country-specific sections could use more content, such as the non-existent "History" subsection for Russia (it only includes "Standards" currently). Other countries which are mentioned in the "Historical overview" like Austria and Germany, could also use sections.
  • Images: No images were removed. The arrangement was changed, to better fit the new article layout. One caption for the back of a card was changed as it referred to a postcard front which was no longer on the page. I also added an image of "Lipman's Postal Card" and a field postal from the Franco-Prussian War (which are specifically mentioned in the body).


Thank you all, I hope everyone is receptive to this change. Absolutely willing to make modifications as you see fit. UliBretzel (talk) 05:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:WikiProject Postcards

[edit]
You like postcards, then this is the right project for you!

Everyone who is interested in postcards is invited to join the Commons:WikiProject Postcards. There, we have been trying to organize the huge mass of images on the topic in the Commons since March 2020. Best regards --sk (talk) 10:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]