Jump to content

Talk:Apache Chief: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Comics}}, {{WikiProject Animation}}, {{WikiProject Fictional characters}}.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{comicsproj|DC-work-group=yes|class=Start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Animation|class=Start|importance=Low|hanna-barbera=yes|hanna-barbera-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Comics|DC-work-group=yes|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Animation|importance=Low|hanna-barbera=yes|hanna-barbera-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Fictional characters}}
}}


==Eh-neeek-chock==


previously: Inuk chuk

== Inuk chuk ==



I thought it was "EENIK CHOK!". (That's just my opinion, I couldn't find a source.) -- John R. Sellers 04:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
I thought it was "EENIK CHOK!". (That's just my opinion, I couldn't find a source.) -- John R. Sellers 04:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Line 16: Line 17:
This is the single most inane argument on the entire internet. It's "inuck chuk." I used to think it KEENUCK chuk, but since people who actually wrote the show say otherwise, I'm just chalking it up to my eight year old ears and LETTING IT GO.
This is the single most inane argument on the entire internet. It's "inuck chuk." I used to think it KEENUCK chuk, but since people who actually wrote the show say otherwise, I'm just chalking it up to my eight year old ears and LETTING IT GO.


I put I-neeek-chock because that's what he says. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.242.102.226|98.242.102.226]] ([[User talk:98.242.102.226|talk]]) 00:50, 24 November 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I put Eh-neeek-chock because that's what he says. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.242.102.226|98.242.102.226]] ([[User talk:98.242.102.226|talk]]) 00:50, 24 November 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==JLU==
==JLU==
Line 37: Line 38:


'Inukchuk' is how Manitou Raven's magic word is spelled in the 'Justice League Elite' comic book. [[User:Lots42|Lots42]] ([[User talk:Lots42|talk]]) 09:56, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
'Inukchuk' is how Manitou Raven's magic word is spelled in the 'Justice League Elite' comic book. [[User:Lots42|Lots42]] ([[User talk:Lots42|talk]]) 09:56, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

You want to mention that he also appeared in a Harvey Birdman Attorney at Law episode? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.115.208.61|69.115.208.61]] ([[User talk:69.115.208.61#top|talk]]) 18:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Powder or pie? ==
== Powder or pie? ==

Latest revision as of 09:29, 8 February 2024

Eh-neeek-chock

[edit]

previously: Inuk chuk

I thought it was "EENIK CHOK!". (That's just my opinion, I couldn't find a source.) -- John R. Sellers 04:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Isn't it inukshuk? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 23:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds more like ENECK CHUCK. Definitely not 'inuk chuk' WTH?!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.247.0.219 (talk) 01:33, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the single most inane argument on the entire internet. It's "inuck chuk." I used to think it KEENUCK chuk, but since people who actually wrote the show say otherwise, I'm just chalking it up to my eight year old ears and LETTING IT GO.

I put Eh-neeek-chock because that's what he says. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.242.102.226 (talk) 00:50, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JLU

[edit]

A few clones of Long Shadow DO appear in Panic in the Sky. However it is quite likely the entire batch were killed off earlier and personalities were removed as none of them get a line. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.137.197.229 (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Apachechief.jpg

[edit]

Image:Apachechief.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

myspace?

[edit]

Really, Is this relevant to the character?

Magic word

[edit]

'Inukchuk' is how Manitou Raven's magic word is spelled in the 'Justice League Elite' comic book. Lots42 (talk) 09:56, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You want to mention that he also appeared in a Harvey Birdman Attorney at Law episode? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.208.61 (talk) 18:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Powder or pie?

[edit]

I seem to recall it was magical POWDER not PIE. And even though it's been PIE for a long time, I'm still willing to go ahead and change...! MartinSFSA (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]