Jump to content

Talk:Richmond District, San Francisco: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject California}}.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject California|class=start|importance=|sfba=yes|sfba-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject California|importance=|sfba=yes|sfba-importance=Mid}}
}}


Line 23: Line 25:


As a Richmond District native born and raised and still living, I would say the title "neighborhoods" for section 3.1 of this article do not fit into the content well since the Richmond is already a neighborhood itself. The Sunset District has the same case as the Richmond with different "neighborhoods" as well such as the inner sunset, outer sunset, parkside, etc, so they titled that section "Micro Neighborhoods" in their Wikipedia article in which I believe is more relevant. Therefore a more appropriate title for 3.1 should be something what the Sunset District's article had came up with like micro neighborhoods, segments, sub-neighborhoods, clusters, or any other more suitable term.
As a Richmond District native born and raised and still living, I would say the title "neighborhoods" for section 3.1 of this article do not fit into the content well since the Richmond is already a neighborhood itself. The Sunset District has the same case as the Richmond with different "neighborhoods" as well such as the inner sunset, outer sunset, parkside, etc, so they titled that section "Micro Neighborhoods" in their Wikipedia article in which I believe is more relevant. Therefore a more appropriate title for 3.1 should be something what the Sunset District's article had came up with like micro neighborhoods, segments, sub-neighborhoods, clusters, or any other more suitable term.
[[User:Wfrmsf|Wfrmsf]] ([[User talk:Wfrmsf|talk]]) 02:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


I made revert on the title to prior to October 2012 as that title for that section is more suitable. This way it also matches with the Sunset District article as that neighborhood is also divided into smaller neighborhoods as well with various zip codes. I also simplified some sentences to avoid any repetition and the boarder for Central Richmond is at 32rd Avenue, not 33rd.
[[Special:Contributions/2601:646:4180:68:F9C8:2F39:3FBC:9406|2601:646:4180:68:F9C8:2F39:3FBC:9406]] ([[User talk:2601:646:4180:68:F9C8:2F39:3FBC:9406|talk]]) 01:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

[[User:Wfrmsf|Wfrmsf]] ([[User talk:Wfrmsf|talk]]) 02:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Richmond District, San Francisco]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=730831692 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20040813063506/http://www.sfmuseum.net:80/sutro/bio.html to http://www.sfmuseum.net/sutro/bio.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 10:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on [[Richmond District, San Francisco]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/814533580|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516220827/http://www.sfhistoryencyclopedia.com/articles/s/streetNaming.html to http://www.sfhistoryencyclopedia.com/articles/s/streetNaming.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 10:57, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:31, 8 February 2024


The article states that Hugo Street in the Sunset District is the "H" street. The outside page that the article links to, however, on the "street naming controversy," at the Encyclopedia of San Francisco, states what I was told all my life growing up in the Richmond District, that Lincoln was originally to be the "H" street but it was changed in order to honor Abraham Lincoln with a street. The page at the Encyclopedia of San Francisco makes no mention of Hugo Street whatever.

The Sunset District page has the same info has this page.--Ncosmob 17:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right, source: [1] Jonemerson 00:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

boundaries

[edit]

The new addition referring to the election district uses the weasel words some people. I think that we should rewrite the introduction as follows:

  1. remove the reference to election district 1 in the first sentence.
  2. Consider adding a single sentence noting the discrepancy between the traditional district boundaries and the election district boundaries.

Comments? --Ishu 00:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Implemented. Thanks for the suggestion. Jonemerson 00:58, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Although many people consider Arguello to be the eastern boundary of Inner Richmond just as the article says, IIRC this is inconsistent with the real estate maps in City Hall. (I'm guessing that they're in City Hall now; they were in 875 Stevenson when I last saw them.) 66.218.54.163 (talk) 17:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boundaries of Sub-Districts

[edit]

I cleaned up the sub-district section. If you look at a map of San Francisco, I think my edits were accurate.69.181.41.173 (talk) 02:57, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Section 3.1 - Neighborhoods

[edit]

As a Richmond District native born and raised and still living, I would say the title "neighborhoods" for section 3.1 of this article do not fit into the content well since the Richmond is already a neighborhood itself. The Sunset District has the same case as the Richmond with different "neighborhoods" as well such as the inner sunset, outer sunset, parkside, etc, so they titled that section "Micro Neighborhoods" in their Wikipedia article in which I believe is more relevant. Therefore a more appropriate title for 3.1 should be something what the Sunset District's article had came up with like micro neighborhoods, segments, sub-neighborhoods, clusters, or any other more suitable term. Wfrmsf (talk) 02:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I made revert on the title to prior to October 2012 as that title for that section is more suitable. This way it also matches with the Sunset District article as that neighborhood is also divided into smaller neighborhoods as well with various zip codes. I also simplified some sentences to avoid any repetition and the boarder for Central Richmond is at 32rd Avenue, not 33rd.

Wfrmsf (talk) 02:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richmond District, San Francisco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richmond District, San Francisco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:57, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]