Talk:Waluigi/GA1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 16:58, 9 February 2024

GA Review

~~Passed.~~ Begocci (talk) 16:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Review has been rolled back per discussion at WT:GAN; nomination is not passed, and a new review will be conducted on a different page.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Begocc (talk · contribs) 15:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh this will be fun.

GA review

Last updated: 16:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC) by BlueMoonset

See what the criteria are and what they are not

1) Well-written

1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

2) Verifiable with no original research

2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

2c) it contains no original research

2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism

3) Broad in its coverage

3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

4) Neutral:

4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

5) Stable:

5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio

6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Overall:

Comments:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==GA Review==
+{{atop
+| status =
+| result = <s>Passed.</s> [[User:Begocc|Begocci]] ([[User talk:Begocc|talk]]) 16:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)<br/>Review has been rolled back per discussion at [[WT:GAN]]; nomination is not passed, and a new review will be conducted on a different page.
+}}
 {{Good article tools}}
 <noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Waluigi/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Waluigi/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
@@ Line 7: / Line 11: @@
 <!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
+Oh this will be ''fun''.
 ==='''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review'''===
 '''Last updated:''' {{#time:H:i, j F Y|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}} (UTC) by {{REVISIONUSER}}
@@ Line 14: / Line 19: @@
 ) '''Well-written'''
+:{{GAIconList/icon|y}} 1a) the prose is clear, concise, and [[WP:Make technical articles understandable|understandable to an appropriately broad audience]]; spelling and grammar are correct
-:{{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
-}} 1a) the prose is clear, concise, and [[WP:Make technical articles understandable|understandable to an appropriately broad audience]]; spelling and grammar are correct
-:{{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
+:{{GAIconList/icon|y
 }} 1b) it complies with the [[WP:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] guidelines for [[WP:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead sections]], [[WP:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[WP:Manual of Style/Words to watch|words to watch]], [[WP:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[WP:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|list incorporation]]
 ) '''[[WP:Verifiability|Verifiable]]''' with '''no original research'''
+:{{GAIconList/icon| y}} 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with [[WP:FNNR|the layout style guideline]]
-:{{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
-}} 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with [[WP:FNNR|the layout style guideline]]
-:{{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
+:{{GAIconList/icon|y
 }} 2b) [[WP:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] are [[WP:Inline citation|cited inline]]. All content that [[Wikipedia:Content that could reasonably be challenged|could reasonably be challenged]], except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
-:{{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
+:{{GAIconList/icon|likely
 }} 2c) it contains [[WP:No original research|no original research]]
-:{{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
+:{{GAIconList/icon|y
 }} 2d) it contains no [[WP:Copyright violations|copyright violations]] or [[WP:Plagiarism|plagiarism]]
 ) '''Broad in its coverage'''
-:{{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
+:{{GAIconList/icon|y
 }} 3a) it addresses the [[WP:Out of scope|main aspects]] of the topic
-:{{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
+:{{GAIconList/icon|y
 }} 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see [[WP:Summary style|summary style]])
 ) '''Neutral:'''
+:{{GAIconList/icon|y}} 4) '''[[WP:Neutral point of view|Neutral]]''': it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
-:{{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
-}} 4) '''[[WP:Neutral point of view|Neutral]]''': it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
 ) '''Stable:'''
+:{{GAIconList/icon|y}} 5) '''Stable''': it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing [[WP:Edit warring|edit war]] or content dispute
-:{{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
-}} 5) '''Stable''': it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing [[WP:Edit warring|edit war]] or content dispute
 ) '''Illustrated''', if possible, by '''media''' such as [[WP:Images|images]], [[WP:Videos|video]], or [[WP:Audio|audio]]
+:{{GAIconList/icon|y}} 6a) media are [[WP:File copyright tags|tagged]] with their [[WP:FAQ/Copyright|copyright statuses]], and [[WP:Non-free use rationale guideline|valid non-free use rationales]] are provided for [[WP:Non-free content|non-free content]]
-:{{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
-}} 6a) media are [[WP:File copyright tags|tagged]] with their [[WP:FAQ/Copyright|copyright statuses]], and [[WP:Non-free use rationale guideline|valid non-free use rationales]] are provided for [[WP:Non-free content|non-free content]]
+:{{GAIconList/icon|y}} 6b) media are [[MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[WP:Manual of Style/Captions|suitable captions]]
-:{{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
-}} 6b) media are [[MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[WP:Manual of Style/Captions|suitable captions]]
-'''Overall''': {{GAIconList/icon| ReplaceWithIcon
+'''Overall''': {{GAIconList/icon|y
 }}
 ====Comments:====
+{{abot}}